[flashbunny]

the most important demographic isn't mentioned: The fraudulent voter.

Just heard 200,000 new voters have been registered in wisconsin. 130,000 alone by a left wing group centered in milwaukee. Expect many of them to be 'voting' in large numbers via absentee ballot.

[Paleo Conservative]

In 1968, Richard Nixon won the White House with just 43% of the Women's vote.

But that was about his proportion of the total vote. It was a three-way race.

[MJY1288]

By the end of this week the media will start turning on Kerry. The guy is a flake and they know it deep down and they will start distancing themselves from him very shortly

[SteveMcKing]

Nice looking graphs.....

[HitmanLV]

The problem with using the Clinton '92 numbers is that that was a 3-way race with a serious 3rd party. There is no serious third party this time.

[upchuck]

Not to beat a dead horse, but I hope the President's win is so strong the RATS won't consider a protest.

His winning by 10-15 percentage points and 30-40 EVs would be perfect.

[Redcloak]

Another demographic item to note: Kerry just invested a day at Black churches. The Black vote is supposed to be "0wn3d" by the Democrats. Why is he spending time in October shoring up a part of the base that was supposedly secured 70 years ago by FDR?!

[Dont Mention the War]

I plan to get my vote in early, just in case E-day is crazy. You might want to make sure you’ll get your vote in, also.

No thanks. I'd like to make sure it has at least an even chance of being counted. I'll vote using my regular machine on Election Day.

[mcg1969]

The comparisons to Bill Clinton in 1992 are invalid. We had a three-party election that year, so it is reaosnable to expect Clinton's numbers to be lower across the board as result.