Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blogbat

This sounds VERY urban legendish. It is highly unlikely for one server to take down "Millions of websites". OTOH, millions of hits, widely distributed, can take down one website. This is called a a Distributed Denial of Service, or DDOS attack.

I believe your "inside confidential source" might have his cause and effect switched.

Scenario 1. Did the DMAT server choke? Maybe. If so, then it was brought down, recovered, and came back up with little fanfare.

Scenario 2. Did "millions of websites" go down? No - there would have been a HUGE outcry about it.

Scenario 3. This is an example of disinformation. This is possible, given the misspellings, stilted language, and incorrect capitalizations in the original posting.

Scenario 4. The poster is simply mistaken. Most likely.

Verdict: I go with Scenario 4.



10 posted on 10/10/2004 3:08:30 PM PDT by Turk82_1 (They also serve who merely stand and wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Turk82_1
The source is a very reliable first-hand one. I received the information directly and will stick my reputation by it.

By definition a DDoS is distributed and uses countless zombies to unleash its payload. I am not aware if such would be controlled through the DMAT server, though "DDoS" is assumed on my part (never stated by the source) due to the scale of the attacks and I think rightly so.

If I can find more out, I will pass it along.
14 posted on 10/10/2004 3:17:38 PM PDT by blogbat (Holding Out for 2008, but still voting in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Turk82_1
"This sounds VERY urban legendish. It is highly unlikely for one server to take down "Millions of websites"."

That's exactly what I was thinking, and your four points are right-on, especially #2. If this had really happened, there would be no lid big enough to keep it off every tech site on the web. This is one of those spooky-scary types of stories that use a bit of mysterious language and official-sounding names to give it validity in the minds of the less-informed. Until I see a dozen or so tech sites with this sitting on their front page, it's a wastebasket story on par with CBS's finest in journalism excellence.
16 posted on 10/10/2004 3:20:45 PM PDT by NJ_gent (Conservatism begins at home. Security begins at the border. Please, someone, secure our borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Turk82_1; blogbat
This sounds VERY urban legendish. It is highly unlikely for one server to take down "Millions of websites".

Not only does it sound urban-legendish, it's starting to smell like pure Bravo Sierra. Nothing of the sort shows up in The Internet Traffic Report, The Internet Health Report, The Internet Storm Center, or any other net-tracking center.

26 posted on 10/10/2004 4:19:13 PM PDT by Prime Choice (It is dangerous to be right when wicked is called 'good.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson