To: freespirited
The answer here is not to ask the question, but to definitively make the charge. It needs to be stated as a matter of fact that Kerry was less than honorably discharge. Dishonorably discharged even. It should come from friendlies in the media and the GOP.
This would put Kerry on the defensive, and force him to disprove it by releasing his records fully. So long as there is one document in his record not released, the charge will not be disproved.
I highly suspect that Kerry would be unable to disprove the charge, since you cannot disprove that which is true.
12 posted on
10/10/2004 10:52:59 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: counterpunch
The answer here is not to ask the question, but to definitively make the charge. It needs to be stated as a matter of fact that Kerry was less than honorably discharge. Dishonorably discharged even. It should come from friendlies in the media and the GOP.Al Gore, the King of Campaign Dirty Tricks, would be the first to tell you that it's too early to drop the hammer on the "Dishonorable Discharge" gambit. You need to wait until just 7 to 10 days before the election. Remember the Bush DUI charge?
23 posted on
10/10/2004 11:03:10 AM PDT by
Tallguy
(If the Kerry campaign implodes any further, they'll reach the point of "singularity" by election day)
To: counterpunch
The answer here is not to ask the question, but to definitively make the charge. It needs to be stated as a matter of fact that Kerry was less than honorably discharge. Dishonorably discharged even. It should come from friendlies in the media and the GOP. What are they waiting for? It's Oct 10 already!
I'd rather the charge come from the RNC! ..but it'll probably come from the Swiftees! But When?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson