Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy SEAL examines Kerrys Military Record SEALED MILITARY RECORD?
KGO Newstalk, AM 810 ^ | October 10, 2004 | A. L. "Steve" Nash

Posted on 10/10/2004 9:13:59 AM PDT by finnigan2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: finnigan2

I know he has never been called by the MSM on his subersive activities and it is truly not fair.. How can people honestly vote for him with this hanging out there... I really wish one of those town hall debate questions would have been about his post war activities and his military record... I mean there is so much press on it but it is being muffeled


41 posted on 10/10/2004 10:59:19 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (The Plan to Win the Peace was subverted by the liberals and this isn't the first time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

These two sections were repealed in 1994.


42 posted on 10/10/2004 11:03:48 AM PDT by Forrestfire (Its what you learn AFTER you know everything, that counts. John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

These two sections were repealed in 1994.


43 posted on 10/10/2004 11:04:07 AM PDT by Forrestfire (Its what you learn AFTER you know everything, that counts. John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny

Yeah. What is needed is hard proof -- is that coming this month?


44 posted on 10/10/2004 11:04:26 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bannie

I agree.

this being so, and assuming the rumors are true, he must have a defense planned. any ideas about what he could say to refute this (other then saying the records are forged).


45 posted on 10/10/2004 11:07:10 AM PDT by tazannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fanningp

another rumor is that there is a document declaring Kerry "Unfit for Command", hence the title of the book.


46 posted on 10/10/2004 11:10:04 AM PDT by tazannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

bttt


47 posted on 10/10/2004 11:10:40 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Looks like 10 USC 1162 and 1163 were repealed in 1994:

10 USCS § 1162 (2004)
[§ 1162. Repealed]
HISTORY; ANCILLARY LAWS AND DIRECTIVES

This section (Act Aug. 10, 1956, ch 1041, § 1, 70A Stat. 89; Sept. 2, 1958, P.L. 85-861, § 1(27), 72 Stat. 1450) was repealed by Act Oct. 5, 1994, P.L. 103-337, Div A, Title XVI, Subtitle C, § 1662(i)(2), 108 Stat. 2998 (effective Dec. 1, 1994, as provided by § 1691 of such Act, which appears as 10 USCS § 10001 note). This section provided for discharge of reserves. For similar provisions, see 10 USCS § 12681.

Courtesy of Lexis.


48 posted on 10/10/2004 11:15:35 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Forrestfire

I see. I could only find it by putting in the date of it's repeal. Twisted!


49 posted on 10/10/2004 11:16:52 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
I just finished Unfit for Command. It has a chronology of Kerry's service. IIRC, it has him getting an honorable discharge in 1978.

1978 is what Kerry's web site shows. Is it just coincidence that Jimmy Carter took office in 1977 and pardoned all draft dodgers that year?

50 posted on 10/10/2004 11:21:46 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Conservative Infidel
Clearly the above document was produced on a word processor (fully justified text).

The 'boilerplate' standard form verbiage is typeset (justified). Individual details (date, name, etc.) were added with a typewriter.

Common practice. Nothing suspicious about that...

52 posted on 10/10/2004 11:47:30 AM PDT by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

1978...The Carter years when amnesty was bestowed...I think there is something in the records to show that he had a dishonorable discharge, but it was changed or altered at THAT time..


53 posted on 10/10/2004 12:20:03 PM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Infidel
Calling Buckhead. Mary Mapes is at it again.

It appears to be a standard typeset form with Kerry's name and discharge date about the only things typed (and hard to read.)

You are right, Kerry could have posted a "Fake" discharge document on his Web site.

I would attack this angle rather than the March 2001 doc which we can't get our hands on.

54 posted on 10/10/2004 12:28:19 PM PDT by christie (John F. Kerry Timeline - http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2
It is disgusting that the main stream media won't touch this with a ten foot pole but are so eager to prove that GW Bush received preferential treatment and may not have attended all required meetings!!!!! They (the MSM) even attempted to fabricate false documents to prove their allegations against GWB????

A thinking American would NOT vote for John F. Kerry until he has released ALL of his military documents, only a fool would!!!

55 posted on 10/11/2004 9:09:34 AM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2

Remember all these records were/are in kerry's FBI files....could be where the leak is/has come from.


56 posted on 10/11/2004 9:13:24 AM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2
Sorry, I have to dispute some of this, having spent too many hours looking into the questions on my own and using the source docs. I will go by memory, don't have time to quote them all over again.

1) Kerry's OCS agreement does not "obligate" him to 48 drills. It suggests that as one of two possible activities, and even mentions a third which is "such duty as the Navy requires."

2) After 1971 Kerry's records were transferred to Naval Manpower Reserve in Bainbridge and where they (apparently ) were held for the remaining 2 years of his Active reserve status. NMR's responsibility was to match a reservist with a command. If in the post-VN drawdown there was no such match, then Kerry would have remained "in limbo" with NMR. And in fact he did send NMR a status update in the fall of 1971.

3) Active Reservists are not subject to UCMJ except while in the actual performance of their reserve duties.

4) I have repeatedly asked FR members about this "2001 discharge" and have received no answers. There is a 1978 Honorable Discharge document out there, but I have yet to see anything dated 2001.

Not trying to bash the author here, these are all reasonable questions. But the research I've done indicates that several are really non-issues.

Nor do any of the facts relieve Kerry the fundamental immorality and disloyalty of visiting Paris while a Naval officer or dissing the millions of honorable men who served with him in VN.

Personally, it makes me sick that I wore a U.S. Navy uniform at the same time this traitor was a Reserve Naval Officer.

57 posted on 10/11/2004 9:13:54 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2

Would the Navy really have given a medal "winner" like Kerry a less-than-honorable discharge? Say what you will, the services are concerned about appearances, and Kerry appeared to be a hero (at least regarding the award of his medals). Would the Navy have done that?


58 posted on 10/11/2004 9:14:34 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
it has him getting an honorable discharge in 1978.

Not to come down hard on you, but we go through this every time this story surfaces.

Separation does not equal discharge.

Kerry was separated in 1978.

He was discharged in 2001.

Service members get DD214s when they are separated and when they are discharged.

Until someone shows that the 2001 discharge was not for strength adjustments (and there are documents out on the 'net indicating that it was for strength adjustments), I put this 'less-than-honorable' story in the 'nice, but likely not true' category.

Do people here know how an officer gets a less-than-honorable? If there was an Admiral's mast or court martial, do you think it'd have been hidden for two or three decades?
59 posted on 10/11/2004 9:14:52 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Mosquitos are a nuisance. Shooting up schoolkids for the Fallujah martyrs is NOT a nuisance.[Lileks])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2

This is not true. On his website, Kerry has his honorable discharge, dated February of 1978.


60 posted on 10/11/2004 9:16:18 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson