[bahblahbah]

Why do we have an article from a male talking about the womens vote? Many of these pundits are just plain stupid.

[arasina]

Why do we have an article from a male talking about the womens vote?

The author may have been born male, but he writes like a teenaged girl. His "hunch" is nothing more than wishful thinking. Deep down he surely knows that WOOD beats out PAPER every single time.

[no dems]

Why do we have an article from a male talking about the womens vote? He's a girlie man.

[Tweaker]

"It's very much worth remembering, in fact, how aggressively male a domain cable television is. The worst moment, when Bush just clearly behaved like a rude jerk, came at 9:36 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, when Charlie Gibson was trying to ask him a follow-up and Bush brusquely waved him off, interrupted, and charged forward and started yelping about Tony Blair. It was witnessing this moment that made me start to think about women viewers. But Chris Matthews, naturally, thought it was great. Which makes me think I'm on to something."


He may have the equipment but that is where the similarities end.
Substitute gloria stymed for tomansky and I doubt anyone would notice.

This boy is the poster child for the feminazis dream man, and proud of it.