Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
Nader and Peroutka couldn't meet the ballot requirements for all 50 States. Badnarik did so easily.

I'd be ok with only allowing Candidates meeting ballot access requirements in all 50 States as a cut-off for inclusion in the debates. The campaigns for each candidate attending should also be footing the bill for the venue, security, and the airtime. No tax money.

That's be a bunch more fair than the current system.

173 posted on 10/11/2004 7:58:25 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
I'd be ok with only allowing Candidates meeting ballot access requirements in all 50 States as a cut-off for inclusion in the debates.

Which one is more credible.

1. A candidate on 50 states polling less than 0.4 percent, or

2. A candidate on 49 states polling 10 percent?

197 posted on 10/11/2004 9:32:01 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson