Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey
Makes sense for the 9th. A burgler kills a homeowner while in the homeowners house. Delclares self-defense sense the homeowner had his gun drawn and pointed at him.

Just when I thought you were making progress...

A burglar is already initiating force against the homeowner by being in his house without permission. The homeowner would have every right to kill the burglar. The burglar adding the offense of shooting the homeowner on top of his initial offense is no defense.

164 posted on 10/11/2004 7:36:01 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Just when I thought you were making progress... A burglar is already initiating force against the homeowner by being in his house without permission. The homeowner would have every right to kill the burglar. The burglar adding the offense of shooting the homeowner on top of his initial offense is no defense.

By definition, a burglar has initiated no force against the homeowner. Check your law.

It doesn't help your argument when you use "always". Too easy to find exceptions.

167 posted on 10/11/2004 7:41:22 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson