Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch

Would it offend you if I said I am against almost everything aRnold does.. until he defines 'special interest',, and quits playing the game he has been playing.. imo, He has become nothing more than davi$ heavy or make that davi$ lite.


57 posted on 10/08/2004 4:56:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge

No, that wouldn't offend me. I would respect your opinion though I would personally view it as quite a bit of hyperbole. Of course it's a moot question because I know you couldn't possibly believe that and are just trying to get me riled.


59 posted on 10/08/2004 5:02:11 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
And the Proposition 70 argument is all about Arnold holding exclusive power and control

"The governor is going to spend a significant amount of time making sure Californians understand how bad (Propositions) 68 and 70 are for the state," Harris said.

"You'd rather have the governor on your side than against," Russo said. "But the Howard Jarvis organization said it quite well. They've supported the governor on everything he's done. But on this one particular instance, he's wrong."

The governor has reached compact agreements with a half-dozen tribes that currently run casinos. Forty-seven other gaming tribes have not. But Schwarzenegger argues that he should retain the right to negotiate future deals -- a right that Propositions 68 and 70 would take away.

Source


68 posted on 10/08/2004 5:49:16 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson