You know, whites have been regularly discriminated against by Western governments for several decades now. I can't imagine them standing for it much longer, and the consequences may well be a banding together with white supremacist groups; who knows, in a few years, whites may conclude that that's the only way they can survive and/or retain some of their property.
Western elites have imposed dangerous experiments upon their peoples. The price to pay may be higher than we can bear.
For every action...you know the cliche.
As you have pointed out on many of these threads, such reaction is already quite apparent in Europe in general and Britain in particular (e.g., BNP).
Eventually the governments will probably end up confronting the choice of violently suppressing some backlash, or simply letting it happen and hoping it'll all work out in the end. If the former, they will probably lose all legitimacy as governments having the "consent of the governed", and systemic collapse will occur. Apres moi, le deluge...
Regardless, I think the average caucasian, be they European or American, no longer believes that the government is "theirs", i.e., that it is on their side even in a neutral sense. On the contrary, as one article I read put it, sometime around a half century or so ago the governments in the West decided that the people they governed were the problem, and that their prime role was to restrain them. In other words, a civil service attitude was replaced with an overseer attitude, and the citizenry is now regarded by the governors with suspicion and even overt hostility.
Not exactly what the Framers had in mind, at least in this country. And strangely, near as I can tell, not what the monarchs and feudal aristocracy had in mind in historical Europe, either. They at least had some sort of fealty to their genetic countrymen, something that appears to have evaporated under "democracy".
As best as I can tell, we have mainly the judiciary to thank for that, but the legislators were certainly complicit.