To: areafiftyone
Here are several reasons that should justify going in to take out Sadaam.
1. We acted on the info given us by CIA chief Tenant. He was a Clinton appointee. He screwed Bush. Gave him erroneous info. Initially he produced a few photos,and when questioned by bush "is that all" stated that "Iraq having WMD's was a slam dunk". He lied. He's gone. Based on info from CIA and Tenant we should have gone into Iraq.
2. We have had threads here on FR that documents trucks hauling WMD's or suspected poisonous gas beingn trucked into Syria.
3.Once you have the formula to produce chem weapons it is not rocket science to do so. Saddam could have restarted a chem weapon program almost anytime if he could get rid of the UN. inspectors
4.Nuclear weapons are WMD's. Saddam conspired with N. Korea,and Lybia to build 5 nuc's, also well documented here on FR and would have done so had they not been caught. Witness the collapse of Qaddafi.
5.We know Sadaam courted terrorists who hated us. He courted them actively. He had a mock-up plane, a 707 or other, that was used to train terrorists in Iraq,
That's all I could come up with on short notice. But there is plenty more.
93 posted on
10/07/2004 6:14:12 PM PDT by
rodguy911
( President Reagan---all the rest.)
To: rodguy911
Good work. All of this disappears down the rabbit hole. Is the mainstream media rehabilitating Saddam now to help defeat President Bush? I wouldn't put it past them, especially after C-BS was caught using faked documents to cast doubt on the President's TANG service. The media is Kerry transcript service and they will go all out to help him until Election Day. If they have to lie about what went on in Iraq, so be it. Its not like C-BS' conduct is going to stop them.
95 posted on
10/07/2004 6:21:20 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson