Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sthitch

""The House bill would also expand the definition of "providing material support" for terrorists and make it a federal crime for any US citizen to receive "military-type training" from a group designated as a terrorist organization by the US government. "

You ask what the problem might be with this. Well, you may notice that all that is required is that the US government designate a group as a "terrorist organization." Not the Congress. Just the "government."

Now, put in power a party you don't like and use your imagination. What organizations do you belong to? Can you see any point where one of them might be so designated by a party you disagree with?

That's the problem.


29 posted on 10/07/2004 1:58:10 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MineralMan
You ask what the problem might be with this. Well, you may notice that all that is required is that the US government designate a group as a "terrorist organization." Not the Congress. Just the "government."

And – if “The Government” designates a group you belong to as a “criminal organization”, you would be liable under R.I.C.O.

140 posted on 10/08/2004 6:18:27 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson