Would someone please explain how this treaty supercedes my second ammendment rights? And how do they plan on enforcing this treaty?
I don't know. Any treaty that conflicts with the Constitution is not binding. No one has the authority to "ban guns", here.
It cannot. The Senate has the power to approve treaties sent to it by the President. However, once approved a treaty merely has the force of law. The very authority to exist, let alone approve the treaty, is derived from the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. Since the 2nd Amendment is part of the Constitution, no treaty with any nation or combination of nations can revoke our RKBA.
And how do they plan on enforcing this treaty?
I don't know. I would suspect via a tax on the manufacture and sale of guns, gun accessories and all components of ammunition...all of which is a good reason to have plenty of these things, along with reloading tools, stockpiled ahead of time.
If they try the direct route of controlling our guns (i.e. controlling us), then one of our former presidents had an answer for that:
" At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chests; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in the trial of a thousand years.
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide."
Abraham Lincoln
January 27, 1838
We can only be defeated by the likes of John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, 5th columnists that are more interested in the acquistion and maintanence of their own power and wealth than in our liberty. Let's all do our part to make sure that no such treaty comes before the Senate, by making sure that Kerry continues to represent the people of Assachusetts after January 20.
Whoops, didn't you know? All treaty law superceeds the Constitution. (Not sarcasm)