something I have noticed that no one else is talking about is that John Kerry says that Bush had no ligitimate reason for attacking Iraq, there is no connection between Al Qaida and Sadam Husein, and that Bush has lied to America. In his next breath he says that he would have done stuff differently in Iraq and they would have commited more troops. IF IT WAS THE WRONG WAR AT THE WRONG PLACE WRONG TIME WHY IS HE TALKING ABOUT WHAT HE WOULD HAVE DONE, IF THERE WAS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN SADAM AND AL QAIDA. HE CRITICIZES BUSH FOR ATTACKING BUT SAYS HE WOULD HAVE ATTACKED AND DONE STUFF DIFFERENTLY. This is really starting to bug me and no one seems to be picking up on it.
WHY doesn't someone ask him WHAT he would have done?