Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: Rangel's Class War (House votes down the Draft 402-2)
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 6, 2004 | Editorial

Posted on 10/06/2004 5:35:17 AM PDT by OESY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2004 5:35:17 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY

How did Rangle vote?


2 posted on 10/06/2004 5:36:41 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Nay


3 posted on 10/06/2004 5:37:09 AM PDT by Guillermo (OJ is innocent because Mark Fuhrman said the "N" word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY
402-2!!!

Hope he gets the message.

4 posted on 10/06/2004 5:37:13 AM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
SO Rangel brings a bill and then votes against it.

And then we says it was the Republicans who 'prostituted' the legislative process!

The voters in his district should be ashamed of themselves for electing such a ham-fisted hack.
5 posted on 10/06/2004 5:39:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Only a Democrat could call an early vote on his own bill unfair.


6 posted on 10/06/2004 5:39:56 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("Allahu Snackbar!" - the war cry of the pajamadeen - Let's stop VOTE FRAUD NOW! Write your reps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 494
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

      H R 163      2/3 YEA-AND-NAY      5-Oct-2004      7:29 PM
      QUESTION:  On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
      BILL TITLE: Universal National Service Act

Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican   215   12
Democratic 2 186   17
Independent   1    
TOTALS 2 402   29


---- YEAS    2 ---

Murtha
Stark

---- NAYS    402 ---

Abercrombie
Ackerman
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Bachus
Baird
Baker
Baldwin
Ballenger
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bass
Beauprez
Becerra
Bell
Berkley
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Blunt
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burns
Burr
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Carter
Case
Castle
Chabot
Chandler
Chocola
Clay
Clyburn
Coble
Cole
Collins
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cramer
Crane
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cubin
Culberson
Cummings
Cunningham
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
DeLay
Deutsch
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doolittle
Doyle
Dreier
Duncan
Dunn
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
English
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Everett
Farr
Fattah
Feeney
Ferguson
Filner
Flake
Foley
Ford
Fossella
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Gonzalez
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Granger
Graves
Green (TX)
Green (WI)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Gutknecht
Hall
Harman
Harris
Hart
Hastert
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoekstra
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)
Hostettler
Houghton
Hoyer
Hulshof
Hunter
Hyde
Inslee
Isakson
Israel
Issa
Istook
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Jenkins
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Kanjorski
Keller
Kelly
Kennedy (MN)
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
LaHood
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Lynch
Maloney
Manzullo
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCotter
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McInnis
McKeon
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Menendez
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (KS)
Moran (VA)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Nunes
Nussle
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Osborne
Ose
Otter
Owens
Oxley
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pearce
Pelosi
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Pombo
Pomeroy
Porter
Price (NC)
Putnam
Quinn
Radanovich
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Regula
Rehberg
Renzi
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sabo
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrock
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Shays
Sherman
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simmons
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Souder
Spratt
Stearns
Stenholm
Strickland
Stupak
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tancredo
Tanner
Tauscher
Taylor (MS)
Taylor (NC)
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Tierney
Toomey
Towns
Turner (OH)
Turner (TX)
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (FL)
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Wexler
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

---- NOT VOTING    29 ---

Boehlert
Brown (OH)
Brown, Corrine
Cannon
Cox
DeMint
Dooley (CA)
Forbes
Gephardt
Greenwood
Hoeffel
John
Jones (OH)
Kaptur
Kleczka
Kucinich
Lampson
Majette
McIntyre
Meeks (NY)
Millender-McDonald
Nethercutt
Norwood
Portman
Pryce (OH)
Sandlin
Slaughter
Tauzin
Terry



7 posted on 10/06/2004 5:39:57 AM PDT by Guillermo (OJ is innocent because Mark Fuhrman said the "N" word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

One reason this election is historically important is that it will confirm whether Americans are as dumb as the democrats make them out to be by making such mischief.


8 posted on 10/06/2004 5:43:06 AM PDT by NetValue (They're not Americans, they're democrats. They hate the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Actually, I think Israel has a great idea with their similar idea that everyone must serve in the military for two years. Everyone (men and women) goes through basic training but then the women go into non-combatant roles.

The discipline enforced via the military would do wonders for many in this age group. They would also learn the value of team work. I would much rather see military service than the America Corps perversion.

9 posted on 10/06/2004 5:43:58 AM PDT by NorthGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It wasn't about him getting the message.

If was all about Rangel and the DNC using the legislative process as a political tool for the democrats to use against the administration.

Security moms (aka: grown up soccer moms) are scared to death the WOT will arrive at their doorstep via the "draft"

There are at least two women at work who swear Bush is bringing back the draft after the election and that is their sole reason they are voting for Kerry.

Hopefully this will put this nonsense to bed.

Of course the Democrats will now say the GOP is weak on defense because they failed to pass the measures necessary to protect the USA aka: the draft

10 posted on 10/06/2004 5:46:54 AM PDT by Popman (Mozilla Rules, I.E. Drools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Dems are in damage control mode. They are sinking fast.


11 posted on 10/06/2004 5:56:32 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

So he voted against his own bill, as well as the co-sponsors? BWAHAHAHAHA!


12 posted on 10/06/2004 5:56:36 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance ( "Stay safe in the "sandbox", cuz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

Thanks for posting the voting list. I was wondering who the two idiots that voted for it were.


13 posted on 10/06/2004 6:00:59 AM PDT by Barb4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

I heard that Rangel voted against his own legislation.


14 posted on 10/06/2004 6:03:55 AM PDT by b4its2late (John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Perhaps his House mates will think twice about co-sponsoring another Rangel bill.


15 posted on 10/06/2004 6:05:18 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NetValue
[ One reason this election is historically important is that it will confirm whether Americans are as dumb as the democrats make them out to be by making such mischief. ]

You mean how dumb american women are.. Oprah has activated the ditz xote big time.. If Kerry is elected it will be because of american women.. and you're right it could happen and exactly because they are politically dumb urh ignorant.. If Kerry is elected it will prove the founders were precient in not including women in on the vote..

16 posted on 10/06/2004 6:20:53 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

As a woman, I wish I could disagree with you, but unfortunately, I can't.


17 posted on 10/06/2004 6:29:15 AM PDT by Barb4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OESY
I almost spewed my morning coffee when I heard ABC Radio report this morning that REPUBLICANS brought up this vote to show their united opposition to a draft in the face of Democratic criticisms. No mention at all that this piece of legislation was sponsored by Dems and the only two Representatives voting for it were Dems. What? Did Dan Rather switch networks last night while I slept?
18 posted on 10/06/2004 6:30:28 AM PDT by lnbchip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
If Kerry is elected it will prove the founders were precient in not including women in on the vote..

Allow me to correct a common misconception. Nothing in the Constitution ever said who could or could not vote. Is was not viewed as a Federal decision. The qualifications for voters were left entirely to the states to decide. At least one state, New Jersey, at the time of the founding, gave women the vote. Before the 18th amendment passed in the early 20th century, a number of states gave the vote to women. Free blacks were also allowed to vote in a number of states in the early days of the nation before the passage of the 15th amendment after the Civil War.

You can't lay that on the Founders. It was always a state issue.

19 posted on 10/06/2004 6:48:40 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Who are the two?


20 posted on 10/06/2004 6:51:52 AM PDT by meyer (Proud member of the Pajamarazzi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson