Replies

Cheney chewed up Edwards like a St Bernard devoured a "Ken doll". Not quite that imbalanced, but in the first half, Edwards demagogic points were rebutted point-blank time after time. But on one point, the Bush/Cheney camp are missing the rebuttal point. This is the Kery/Edwards talking point that Saddam was not involved in 9/11. We need the Bush side to remind the "say anything do nothing" pair of grandstanders that we are in a war with TERRORISM, not the 9/11 Hijackers. They need to say:

"LOOK, you keep talking about Saddam's lack of connections to 9/11 ... 9/11 was a terrible and horrific attack. But it is not the only terrorist attack. we were attacked in 1996 Khobar towers, Cole, Embassy bombing, Achille Lauro, and since 911 we've had Madrid, Bali, Istanbul, Beslan ... We declared war - not on Al Qaeda, not on the 9/11 hisjacker, but on the WHOLE GLOBAL TERRORIST THREAT. And to attack that threat, rip it up, and remove it, you have to go after those rogue regimes, like Saddam Hussein's that aided, trained, sponsored, and harbored those global terrorists. Saddam Hussein did those things. He aided, funded, trained and harbored terrorists.

And that is just ONE good reason why removing him from power was the right thing to do."

http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/