Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rcpl30
"From the threads, I guess that the legislative intent was to ban *all* civil unions, to presumably prevent gays from utilizing them as a 'fallback' to marriage. But the wording explicitly defines (and would eliminate) even heterosexual civil unions. "

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I interpret it to mean that a "heterosexual civil union" would, by virtue of the law, only exist as a common law marriage. What other kind of civil union do you think exists?
41 posted on 10/12/2004 9:11:16 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: unlearner
Thank you for an outstanding answer.

God is correct, and always will be.


42 posted on 10/17/2004 3:38:55 PM PDT by Yosemitest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson