RECALL/IMPEACH JUDGE William A. "Bill" Morvant, Republican

Oct 5, 2004

[unlearner]

"From the threads, I guess that the legislative intent was to ban *all* civil unions, to presumably prevent gays from utilizing them as a 'fallback' to marriage. But the wording explicitly defines (and would eliminate) even heterosexual civil unions. "

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I interpret it to mean that a "heterosexual civil union" would, by virtue of the law, only exist as a common law marriage. What other kind of civil union do you think exists?

[Yosemitest]

Thank you for an outstanding answer.

God is correct, and always will be.

The references are
Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

and
Romans 1:18-32
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

[Yosemitest]

I read the headline this morning in the paper, about his overturning the gay marriage ban.

Can you post taht article for all of us, to this thread?

[rvoitier]

Here you go.

Exodus 18:16

[Yosemitest]

Thanks.

I read it and think that this excuse-for-a-judge has a reprobate mind (Romans 1:28) and deserves no respect whatsoever.

He should be impeached/recalled.

[Yosemitest]

And thanks for Exodus 18:16. It fits very well to this article.

When they have a matter, they come unto me; and I judge between one and another, and I do make them know the statues of God, and his laws.