To: FesterUSMC
That's dangerous. Perhaps we should pass a law saying, "all persons born on or after January 1, 1956 shall be ineligible for any Social Security benefits whatsoever; however, they shall be liable to make appropriate contributions to the system as if they would have been eligible for benefits."
7 posted on
10/05/2004 2:45:35 PM PDT by
dufekin
(President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969, when Kerry first committed treason.)
To: dufekin
You can never have a cutoff of Social Security benefits like that. Very long-term sliding scale, if at all...
12 posted on
10/05/2004 2:48:07 PM PDT by
Tacos
To: dufekin
That's dangerous. Perhaps we should pass a law saying, "all persons born on or after January 1, 1956 shall be ineligible for any Social Security benefits whatsoever; however, they shall be liable to make appropriate contributions to the system as if they would have been eligible for benefits." NO! what we need to do to save Social Security is do what Bush say's and start personal accounts that the government can't touch for younger people so that they will have Social Security when the become of age, otherwise they will get nothing!
18 posted on
10/05/2004 2:52:04 PM PDT by
FesterUSMC
(If you don't have the hammer your going to be the anvil, and I would rather be the hammer!FesterUSMC)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson