Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2004 9:58:02 AM PDT by SmithPatterson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithPatterson

Out of the standard Democrat playbook. Scare South Park Republicans into voting Dem to avoid losing legal abortion.


2 posted on 10/05/2004 10:01:17 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson
Why does the Center for Reproductive Rights get to create AP news in an election season? How many right-leaning groups are afforded that privilege.
3 posted on 10/05/2004 10:02:38 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

All the more reason to overturn Roe!


4 posted on 10/05/2004 10:03:37 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

It should be up to the states. It's not like they will all ban it (unfortunately). Marxichusetts and Californicate will no doubt have highly-publicized legal abortions, with "tuition" assistance for those hailing from states with bans.


5 posted on 10/05/2004 10:07:01 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson
his anti-abortion views.

It is called pro-life, you left slanted agenda driven liar reporter. We can only pray that this will happen, and we can begin to really save some lives.

6 posted on 10/05/2004 10:09:18 AM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

High risk/Low risk? Why not use words like "more likely/less likely"??? Oops, I keep forgetting the evil MSM and its Left-wing agenda.


8 posted on 10/05/2004 10:15:58 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

Typical yahoo...


9 posted on 10/05/2004 10:19:01 AM PDT by talleyman (The Kerry Sutra - 1001 positions, every one scr*wed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

One thing I've never understood is if "pro-choice" people really believe they are the vast majority, why do they think Roe v. Wade is necessary for legal abortion? I think it is highly unlikely 30 states would "ban" abortion if Roe v. Wade were overturned. And it is unlikely that Roe v. wade will be overturned. This is media scare tactics to get out the pro-abortion vote to defeat Bush.


10 posted on 10/05/2004 10:22:28 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson
When Roe v. Wade is overturned, Congress should adopt a law banning abortion in all 50 states pursuant to the 5th and 14th Amendments. "No person shall be deprived of life... without due process of law". Abortionists are not courts, yet they kill babies. A pro-life Congress should be able to protect the constitional right to life of unborn babies.

"Because a caring society will value its weakest members, we must make a place for the unborn child."
-- President George W. Bush, 9/2/04 Republican National Convention

11 posted on 10/05/2004 10:23:17 AM PDT by advance_copy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

So ending the murder of over 1 million innocent unborn children, who are primarily murdered for reasons of convenience, lifestyle choice, economic status, etc, is a bad thing exactly how???


12 posted on 10/05/2004 10:23:53 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

Suuuuure they will. Uh-huh. Right.


13 posted on 10/05/2004 10:26:34 AM PDT by Little Ray (John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson; cpforlife.org
The building blocks are already in place to recriminalize abortion

It was never de-criminalized in the only court that matters. Judgement day will be a real eye opener for some.

14 posted on 10/05/2004 10:27:16 AM PDT by jtminton (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

I like how they declare that there are 20 states at "lower risk" of losing abortion rights, as if there was any risk at all in the states they listed (such as California or New York).


16 posted on 10/05/2004 10:38:35 AM PDT by NetResearchMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

It should be up to the States, should have been all along.

What is it about most liberals? They claim to champion democracy, but when push comes to shove, they don't really care about the democratic process.

If RvW were overturned, many states will still allow abortion. That is unfortunate IMO but at least it it would be the will of the people. Over time, I believe there will be more restrictions placed on abortion, rather than an outright ban.


17 posted on 10/05/2004 10:52:09 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

It should be up to the States, should have been all along.

What is it about most liberals? They claim to champion democracy, but when push comes to shove, they don't really care about the democratic process.

If RvW were overturned, many states will still allow abortion. That is unfortunate IMO but at least it it would be the will of the people. Over time, I believe there will be more restrictions placed on abortion, rather than an outright ban.


18 posted on 10/05/2004 10:53:15 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithPatterson

Good! States are supposed to ban MURDER!! I think the 14th Amendment doesn't even allow states to legalize murder. Thus, overturning Roe should require states to ban abortion. But that is just one law student's opinion.


22 posted on 10/05/2004 11:13:15 AM PDT by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson