To: Mamzelle
EnragingWhy?
Why should they treat people without insurance?
Why should we?
I think they are setting a very good example that we should follow.
This is the first thing right about Mexico I have heard in years.
So9
10 posted on
10/05/2004 9:44:42 AM PDT by
Servant of the 9
(Screwing the Inscrutable or is it Scruting the Inscrewable?)
To: Servant of the 9
For starters, taking a "wallet biopsy" on a patient with a bashed-in head is wasting valuable time. By the time you can prove you can pay, you're gorked.
12 posted on
10/05/2004 9:47:26 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
(Pajamamama)
To: Servant of the 9
This is the ONLY kind of care a hospital in ANY country is morally obligated to provide, and the bass turds refused.
Meanwhile, here we treat runny illegal noses in our ERs.
17 posted on
10/05/2004 9:54:07 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: Servant of the 9
How can that be a good examble to follow....The patient died! No one should die because they could not pay up before service. What if the patient is self insured.
This is the first thing right about Mexico I have heard in years.
You may want to rethink your post.
To: Servant of the 9
You should treat people without insurance because some people pay their medical bills themselves. They don't have insurance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson