Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle
Enraging

Why?

Why should they treat people without insurance?
Why should we?

I think they are setting a very good example that we should follow.
This is the first thing right about Mexico I have heard in years.

So9

10 posted on 10/05/2004 9:44:42 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Screwing the Inscrutable or is it Scruting the Inscrewable?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the 9

For starters, taking a "wallet biopsy" on a patient with a bashed-in head is wasting valuable time. By the time you can prove you can pay, you're gorked.


12 posted on 10/05/2004 9:47:26 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Pajamamama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the 9
This is the ONLY kind of care a hospital in ANY country is morally obligated to provide, and the bass turds refused.

Meanwhile, here we treat runny illegal noses in our ERs.

17 posted on 10/05/2004 9:54:07 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the 9
How can that be a good examble to follow....The patient died! No one should die because they could not pay up before service. What if the patient is self insured.

This is the first thing right about Mexico I have heard in years.

You may want to rethink your post.

19 posted on 10/05/2004 9:57:46 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the 9

You should treat people without insurance because some people pay their medical bills themselves. They don't have insurance.


40 posted on 10/05/2004 10:18:27 AM PDT by ladyrustic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson