Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bryant's Attorneys Want Accuser Identified
Yahoo ^ | 10/04/2004 | Staff

Posted on 10/05/2004 5:17:41 AM PDT by Hawk44

DENVER - Attorneys for Kobe Bryant urged a federal judge on Monday to lift the anonymity of the woman accusing the Los Angeles Lakers star of rape, saying she should not be able to bring a "false accusation" in her civil lawsuit without being identified.

"The plaintiff's desire to have it both ways — preserving her anonymity while exposing the intimate details of her sexual encounter with Mr. Bryant and requiring him to bear alone the burden of constant public scrutiny" suggests that her lawsuit is more about putting pressure on the basketball star than anything else, the attorneys wrote.

Prosecutors dropped a felony sexual assault charge against Bryant last month after the woman, now 20, refused to participate in the trial. Her pending civil lawsuit in federal court in Denver seeks unspecified damages for pain and suffering since the alleged attack at a Vail-area resort last summer.

Her attorneys want her anonymity protected.

The filing came on the same day Bryant, 26, prepared for training camp with the rest of the Lakers in California. He did not discuss the case or an allegation he told investigators that former teammate Shaquille O'Neal paid up to $1 million in hush money to various women to keep quiet about similar situations.

There have been few public court filings in the civil case, which was filed in August and is now before U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch. But on Monday, the defense confirmed Bryant has again hired attorneys including Pamela Mackey, who was behind some of the blistering court filings and arguments in the criminal case.

It was Mackey who repeatedly named the woman in open court last year, bringing an admonishment from the pretrial hearing judge. In the latest filing, the defense said the woman has no legitimate claim to push her civil lawsuit anonymously and there was no point because her name has been posted on the Internet and was mistakenly published by courthouse staff during the criminal proceeding.

"Her anonymity, such as it is, is in the hands of the media," the defense said in its filing, which also claimed the woman has moved to the East Coast.

Attorneys for a dozen news organizations have objected to requests by the woman's attorneys to seal documents in the civil case. On Monday, the Rocky Mountain News called for keeping the proceedings open.

"The News and most other media organizations to date have exercised their editorial judgment and not published her name," the newspaper's attorneys wrote. "However, in continuing to report on the plaintiff's civil claim against Mr. Bryant, the News may determine to use the parties' names as it would in other civil proceedings."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: civilaction; fairness
Publish the golddigger's name. She was out for money from day one.
1 posted on 10/05/2004 5:17:41 AM PDT by Hawk44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

"Publish the golddigger's name. She was out for money from day one."

Bingo!


2 posted on 10/05/2004 5:25:51 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Publish the golddigger's name. She was out for money from day one.

Yup. And open up all the records, both from the criminal charge & the civil case.

3 posted on 10/05/2004 5:35:33 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

If the judge says no, this means that you can be accused at any time, by an anonymous accuser, and have the full force of the fed govt come down on you. Pretty scary!


4 posted on 10/05/2004 5:48:14 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka

News: Use Bryant accuser's real name
Federal judge's ruling sought in civil suit against Lakers star

By Karen Abbott, Rocky Mountain News
October 5, 2004

The Rocky Mountain News asked a federal judge Monday to require the woman who has accused Kobe Bryant of rape to use her real name in the civil lawsuit she has filed against the basketball star.

Bryant's lawyers also filed a motion Monday opposing her request to remain anonymous, saying it would result in "unfairness and prejudice" to Bryant.


Advertisement



The woman's lawyer, Lin Wood, said the woman has received several death threats and should remain anonymous in the civil lawsuit to protect her safety.

"The issue here is not one of trying to hide this young lady from the public," Wood said. "It is a matter of trying to protect her."

The newspaper's legal position doesn't mean it will publish the woman's name, News Editor John Temple said.

"In such a highly visible case, it's very important to uphold key matters of principle, and one key principle of our society is that judicial proceedings should remain open, should remain public, to the fullest extent possible," Temple said.

Sarah Graham Miller, spokeswoman for the Washington, D.C.-based Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, said the organization doesn't believe alleged rape victims should be forced to be publicly identified by name.

"There's a lot of reasons why alleged rape victims don't want their names out there," Miller said. "There's still, unfortunately, a stigma attached to rape and sexual assault, and especially in such a high-profile case.

"But we also hope that more and more victims will let their names be published and will have their names as part of their filings," Miller said, "because it shows that they have nothing to be ashamed of."

The Eagle County woman has accused L.A. Lakers star Bryant of raping her during the summer of 2003 at the mountain resort hotel where she worked and he was a guest.

Bryant, who is married, admitted having sex with the woman, but said it was consensual. He was charged with sexual assault in Eagle County, but District Attorney Mark Hurlbert dismissed the criminal case during jury selection in September after the accuser decided not to proceed as a witness.

Her name has been available on the Internet and in some publications, although mainstream news organizations have not disclosed it.

She filed a civil lawsuit against Bryant in Colorado U.S. District Court and asked Judge Richard Matsch to let her proceed in that case as "Jane Doe" instead of under her real name.

"The unfairness of allowing a plaintiff, proceeding anonymously, to publicly attack and vilify a named defendant . . . is a compelling reason to deny a plaintiff's request for anonymity," Bryant's lawyers said.

They said the woman, while seeking anonymity in her civil lawsuit against Bryant, opposed his effort to have the records sealed in the Eagle County criminal case.

This "desire to have it both ways - preserving her anonymity while exposing the intimate details of her sexual encounter with Mr. Bryant" - is more a litigation strategy than anything else, Bryant's lawyers said.

They also said defending Bryant in the lawsuit would be needlessly complicated if her real name can't be used.

Wood disputed that.

"Mr. Bryant and his defense team are well-aware of this young lady's identity and, as demonstrated in the criminal case, their ability to investigate and defend the claim is in no way hampered or diminished by her identity remaining anonymous at this particular time," Wood said.

The News' motion said courts rarely allow parties in civil suits to remain anonymous, even in cases involving allegations of sexual assault. It cited a civil lawsuit against late rap singer Tupac Shakur, in which a woman contended that Shakur sexually assaulted her. The judge refused to let her proceed as "Jane Doe," saying, "Fairness requires that she be prepared to stand behind her charges publicly."

The News' motion said a defendant in a sexual-assault civil suit "is often prejudiced when a plaintiff is allowed to hide behind anonymity."

"Additionally," the News argued, "the plaintiff here cannot assert that any injury would result from disclosure of her name because her name has already been disclosed to the public; it is widely known within her community, it can readily be ascertained on the Internet, and it has already been printed in a local Eagle County newspaper."

Countered Wood: "The public has a right to know certain things. Certainly the media has an interest in reporting certain things. But both the public and the media have a more important interest in this case, and that is to protect the safety and well-being of this young girl."

Temple said the News hopes its opposition to the woman's requested anonymity will help ensure the openness of the court system in the future.

"A case like this can send ripples through a community because people view it as setting how other things can happen, and we view it as important to argue for the openness of the courts," he said.

Pro and con

• "Judicial proceedings should remain open, should remain public, to the fullest extent possible."

- John Temple, editor of the Rocky Mountain News

• "There's still, unfortunately, a stigma attached to rape and sexual assault, and especially in such a high-profile case."

- Sarah Graham Miller, spokeswoman for Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network


5 posted on 10/05/2004 6:04:33 AM PDT by Hawk44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Since when is the federal govt involved in this kind of lawsuit?


6 posted on 10/05/2004 6:08:54 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rogator
I should have said "full force of govt prosecution". But, Matsch is a US District Judge - perhaps the civil suit is using federal statutes? I am not sure.

Anonymous accusers - we have seen how well they work in the cause of justice, not well at all.

7 posted on 10/05/2004 9:46:58 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson