i know that i'm probably going to get flamed for this, but i think sean came off rather ham-fisted in this. colmes came on first and asked some tough but civil questions of the young lady on the program then sean attempts to confine the scope of the liberals answers to yes and no. i believe anyone would balk at that. sean comes off rather badly against many of the liberal pundits because he tends to badger them. i wish he would promote conservative views in a more intelligent vein.
"i know that i'm probably going to get flamed for this, but i think sean came off rather ham-fisted in this."
No flame here, I agree. You can't have a meaningful debate/discussion if one side or the other is limited to yes or no answers. I know this plays great with the choir but can you imagine Bush in an interview limited to yes/no answers posed by Dan Rather. We'd be up in arms. We can do better.