To: johannes89a
Reuters is off to the races with the NYT-inspired conspiracy theory regarding Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld supposedly suppressing information about the non-existence of Saddam's nuke program:Wait a minute Reuters..... I seem to remember a speech given by a guy named Clinton in 1998 that outlined how dangerous Saddam was and how dangerous his 'weapons of mass destruction' would be to the world? And Clinton's Secretary of State, the lovely Madeline Albright, seemed to make that term 'weapons of mass destruction' a household term? Are you suggesting that Clinton and Albright were wrong? Geez, they used the W word two years before GW Bush was elected??????
Way too much liberal spin going on these days.......
7 posted on
10/03/2004 7:39:55 PM PDT by
eeriegeno
To: eeriegeno
If Bush loses the election because of lies like these and skewed debate coverage, we're going to have to contest the results...
I don't know what I'd do if Bush lost. :-(
To: eeriegeno
Wait a minute Reuters..... I seem to remember a speech given by a guy named Clinton in 1998 that outlined how dangerous Saddam was and how dangerous his 'weapons of mass destruction' would be to the world? And Clinton's Secretary of State, the lovely Madeline Albright, seemed to make that term 'weapons of mass destruction' a household term? Are you suggesting that Clinton and Albright were wrong? Geez, they used the W word two years before GW Bush was elected??????
Way too much liberal spin going on these days.......
Wasn't during the time after the exposure of Monica's "services" in the Oval Office (distraction)???
25 posted on
10/03/2004 10:11:44 PM PDT by
danamco
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson