Bush had a lackluster performence in the first debate, and going into the debate on domestic issues, not his strong point, if Bush is not prepared, expect even worse results.
As for Limbaugh, its best to get outside of the talk radio fishbowl.
Ever consider a bit of optimism?
WHY do we even believe these polls? Most of us didn't believe the other ones with Pres. Bush WAY up. All of a sudden they're real?
Get either a grip or a Zoloft.
And into what, the lamestream media headlight glare, perhaps?
If Bush was "lackluster" then sKerry was the epitome of a snakeoil salesman. Greasy, slimey and slippery. sKerry said words that will and are coming back to haunt him. Mostly Bush looked impatient with Kerry. Which frankly wasn't an unusual reaction to the bald-faced lied his opponent was saying.
Guess what most voters are going to remember.
Prairie
Bush did fine in the debate and I like Rush. To each his own.
Kerry needed a complete mastery of Bush in the first debate to make any significant gain in the polls, and he failed to make that happen. As for the economy, Bush will be well prepard to deflect Kerry's hype and lies. He has a masters in business from Harvard Bus. School and he has a better grasp of economic principles than Komrade Kerry does. I think most Americans understand that 9-11 was the major cause of the economic slowdown, and that Bush is doing a good job of leading America back to economic strength and stability. The econony is much stronger now than in the first two years after 9-11, and it's still growing. So try as he will, the communist Kerry won't be able to successfully argue against the facts.
"As for Limbaugh, its best to get outside of the talk radio fishbowl."
Best for the Democrats, that's why it won't happen.