[DCPatriot]

Maybe Kerry had a Groupie in the audience?

If I were married to Tehrayzah I'd want to see the name and number right away too!

I think this is much ado about nothing.

President Bush was not prepared, and if he was, then it's sad. The comedic caricatures are getting painful to watch.

IOW, we got our butts handed to us, stylely speaking. Television can be cruel. Ask Richard Nixon.

[Enduring Freedom]

Bush was setup by a Lib questioner.

Kerry cheated.

"What's worse?" /kerry

[Jeff Head]

Bush diod not get his rear handed to him. He was beat on the style and scholastic measurements of debate skills perhaps...but on issues and on substance, his answers were much more specific and full of detail (IMHO) than Kerry's.

...and I think the people will see it. Sort of like the syaing of this last week...we're electing a President and Comander in Chief, not a debater.

[texasbluebell]

I think this is much ado about nothing.

It's not at all much ado about nothing.

One of the agreed-upon rules of the debate was that nothing, including paper, was to be brought in by either candidate.

Kerry clearly took something out of his pocket, and laid it on his podium.

[Indie]

I think this is much ado about nothing.

WRONG!

President Bush was not prepared

An incomplete pass in football is given a completion by a defensive pass interference call. Why? Because it is CHEATING.

I am sick of the PC types on here who refuse to view cheating for what it is: Wrong.
And it should nullify any "win" Kerry gets by being heavily broadcast in the news. Why? Because CHARACTER MATTERS.

It doesn't matter what it was he removed from his pocket...or wasn't. It was against the rules. And because of that..The burden of proof should be on EFnK. Period.

"Much ado about nothing?" Perhaps it is, in your amoral universe. This attitude is what has led to our incremental moral decline.

/rant