Posted on 10/03/2004 8:31:14 AM PDT by Truth666
The Austrian press (aka socialism-o-rama, secularism-a-gogo) is negative against the Catholic Church? I am SHOCKED, appalled and totally surprised!!!
< sarcasm >
I noticed the same thing right off. Also I noticed the:
"was the only political leader to support Pope Benedict XV's peace efforts"
That line is rather timely also.
Read the article, read the comments. WHO HAS THE FACTS? Please post references. Thanks
A very detailed report of usage of gas grenades: the wonder of Krafreitag - use google to translate
http://www.wienerzeitung.at/frameless/lexikon.htm?ID=955
Surely, there are volumes of books to read on this Emperor Charles I, http://members.fortunecity.se/mikaelxii/ww1/Austria/charles.html ; let alone the history of WW I, to properly understand the subject being discussed.
The comment by Truth666 seems to involve this excerpt from the story:
"But his beatification has caused controversy in Austria, where Charles I is remembered for authorising the use of mustard gas during World War I and where critics believe his elevation to be politically driven by the conservative right."
Maybe the paragraph should be broken into two sentences.
I would wager, his elevation is driven more by the church, rather than the conservative right.
I forget all of my Saints now, I believe there may have been a Priest from Hungary that helped out many oppressed in World War II.
This is a very interesting article because everyone knows a lot about the history of WW II, but not of "the war to end all wars" except for the slight spillover in relations to recent Balkans conflicts.
Mustard gas was introduced by Germany at Ypres on the Westrern Front.
History paints a different picture of Emperor Karl I :
I am still trying to find who gave a man authority to pronounce anybody a "saint".
Good grief!
I would not necessarily accept the spin of AFP on Charles I, or any other topic, for that matter. Of course AFP would be out to slam anyone they saw as being on the right.
Does that mean that "history is written by the victorious" isn't true ?
Victors often give honor to an honorable foe.
Members of the Australian Flying Corps firing a gun salute at Baron von Richthofen's funeral, Bertangles Cemetery, France, 22 April 1918.
I wonder where "Chemical Charles I", AKA comes from in this story and placed in the caption? A reference would be welcomed.
I've started looking at other coverage of this same story.
Seems AFP could have mentioned the name of the German Mystic, a woman in fact, named Anna Emerick. If they mention Mel Gibson's movie, couldn't they at least mention her name.
http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=59147 Is the Catholic Press, I believe.
Of course the biblical definition of saint is anyone who trusts in Christ Jesus.
Too bad Rome's traditions are more authoritative to it than holy scripture.
Why do you think the Vatican sainted him? Because he cured a Brazilian nun of varicose veins??? No, because of its agenda.
The Vatican knows there has never been a single documented miracle associated with this fellow, ever. The just invented one when it was politically convenient to invent another "saint."
Makes you wonder how often this sort of thing occurs. More often than some Catholics would like to admit, I'd imagine.
This isn't the first time JP2 has gone against tradition, saintswise--he beatified Mama T before she had been dead long enough.
It's funny to watch Catholics defend their mystical, complicated rules when their own Pope violates them on a political whim.
The Polish Pontif has confronted both World War II and the Communist Empire; I would not forget this.
On another note, this has shades of, now I remember, Cardinal Stephanic of Croatia being elevated.
One would need to study the issue.
Vericose vein bites can be nasty.
BTTT
Too bad you possess such a poor knowledge of Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the history of Christianity. By the way, you do know that "saint" is found 56 times in the Old Testament, don't you? Also, what authority did Rome invoke when it added chapter and verse division and numbering, which weren't in the originals, to Sacred Scripture?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.