The "Bush lied!" thing would be cute if everyone who adhered to it didn't swarm like flies around sh!t.
Here come the attacks, they know Kerry F***** up with his global vote statement and Bush is going to pound on him.
And this is news? We all heard the "tubes were inappropriate for centifuge" story a year ago. Now the Times is recycling old news to make the President look bad. A little "in kind" contribution to the Kerry Campaign from the editorial board.
Still beating this dead horse hmmmm? Let's see, I wonder if the NYT would of run this headline.
Clinton Aides give onesided view of Impeachment.
Kerry Aides give onesided view of Kerry's Iraq position.
New York Times Editors give onesided view of Iraq war.
NO, but we do get this sort of childish garbage. F- Reuters and NYTimes. This story wouldn't of gotten by a High School Newspaper editor. It is this sort of story that exposes the "News Media" as the Democrat National Comittee whores they are.
As if Reuters ever released even handed articles about Republicans.
Saddam was put on the list of "Things to Do" on September 12th, 2001 and justifiably so. The useless leftist wanna be Ambassadors at the U.N. could not and would not enforce a single one of their 17 worthless Resolutions that threatened Saddam Hussein for violating the armistice Saddam agreed to in 1991.
This is the biggest issue the left has against our President and most Americans no George W. Bush did the right thing in removing Saddam Hussein.
All I can say is Luck the Fiberals
Are these the same experts that were all over the threat that bin Laden posed? (And this isn't news at all, I remember Powell saying that there wasn't conclusive evidence.)
Just in time to use it against Cheney in the Veep debate. These people are so damn predictable.
Ummmm .. Didn't Kerry also say that we should give iran nuclear fuel ??
It's probably old news to everyone reading this, but WMD was found in a roadside bomb (Sarin gas). This isn't really important, though; what matters is that Iran has a fledgling Democracy to the Southeast and one to the West of them. The Iranian and Syrian regimes fear (and rightly so) that they are next. Terrorists are coming to Iraq to die and, as much as possible, to kill and destroy. They are coming from Iran and Syria. If Bush hadn't attacked Iraq, terrorists would have one more vacation spot and one less mission. As it stands, the U. S. can attack Iran from 2 directions, if Iran wishes to play chicken with the President. It's comical when liberals talk about what an idiot President Bush is.
ZERO.
The NYT is upset that Saddam isn't continuing to fill his mass graves at the rate of 16,000 people a year. They need to get over it.