S 89 Bill sponsored by Sen. Fritz Hollings (D-SC) in early 2003, read once, no further action. HR 163 sponsored by Charles Rangel (D- NY 15th Dist.) and cosponsored by: John Conyers (D-Mich. 14th Dist.), Jim McDermott (D-WA 17th Dist.), Neil Abercrombie (D-HI 1st Dist.), Fortney Pete Stark (D-CA 13th Dist), John Lewis, (D-GA 5th Dist.), Corinne Brown (D-FL 3rd Dist.), William Lacy Clay (D-MO 1st Dist.), James P. Moran (D-VA 8th Dist.), Sheila Jackson (D-TX 18th Dist.), Eleanor H. Norton (D-DC), Nydia M. Belazquez (D-NY 12th Dist.), Alcee Hastings (D-FL 23rd Dist.)HR was read the same day as S 89, then once again. It has been referred to two subcommittees and no further action has been taken since early 2003.
Anyone like to hazard a guess as to WHY they wrote and sponsored these bills? I'll give you two guesses and the first one doesn't count.
I might hazard a guess, but what is the real reason?
1) I guess it might be to make the Republican administration look bad?
2) To weaken and demoralize our troops and population?
3) To impose "martial law" upon the population, furthering the alleged Marxist, etc, ideology of some left wingers? (This is a little far-out, but I'm just guessing here).
Ok so I guessed, probably incorrectly, so what's the real reason that the Democrats wrote and sponsored those bills? Inquiring minds want to know.
Can you say "straw man?"