Posted on 10/02/2004 1:45:56 PM PDT by tsmith130
Edited on 10/02/2004 2:53:28 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
And we believe Nesweak because...?
That's nice.
I believe you're wrong.
Doing your part to register "voters" and such are you? What leads you to believe dem turnout will be so high.
Please, do tell.
Yes, in fact he did.
Now we have 'presidential'. It will be on EVERYONE's lips tomorrow. The lamestream all drink from the same faxline.
Then display them and stop posting childish insults. Honestly, a 3 year old could do better.
He was perfect! Right?
This poll reflects what the MSM says about the "debate." That's what it is polling, actually. So the poll is self-generating. Actual VOTING will not shift. Bush by 52-46.
OH NO! Not a Newsweek poll! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA.
I was very dissapointed after the debate. I wouldn't be surprised if Lehrer gave the questions to Kerry is advance and they both prepared to tag team Bush. Every one of the questions were designed to have Bush on the defensive, likewise none of the questions were designed to have Kerry on the defensive.
It should be remembered that Newsweek had Kerry ahead by 7 right after the Democratic National Convention. No other polls showed that high for Kerry (Gallop showed Bush by 6 at the same time).
Also today from Rasmussen:
Penn. Tied (Kerry was ahead previously) polling Sept25 to Oct1
Colorado Bush up by 4 (gain of 3) polling Sept 29
Take consolation from this anyway you want.
The fact is, Bush could have buried Kerry. Put a stake in his stinking commie heart.
The EXACT OPPOSITE happened.
It wouldn't be so bad if Bush lost the debate in a fair fight.
But he was sent up to the podium over-tired and under-prepped.
Bush was set up.
The goddamn campaign manager set him up.
because theyre energized. I live in one of the most GOP counties and CDs in the country. I see anti-Bush and Kerry stickers all over. Now they dont outnumber Bush stickers and Bush will win my state easily. But it shows how energized theey are.
I think Rush and other commentators who think hate cant win an election are wrong. I think it can. It will set the DEMs up for a huge huge loss in 2006 but in 2004 it can deliver the Presidency
Have her read this.
Exactly. It's been plain to me since the debate was going on. Those here to spread their propaganda and the regular freepers who should be embarrassed and ashamed of themselves to be so eager to take negative messages and embrace them.
I guess I should have posted the "dripping sarcasm" tag.
Again, the main thing Kerry had going against him was that people did not personally like him. In the debate, he came across as a decent, normal human being. That alone will pull a lot of people (especially women IMHO) over to his side.
Don't panic, people. Don't forget this election is not decided on national popular vote. It's on state-by-state electoral votes. The President has been behind on the popular vote before, and even WON after losing the popular vote.
One MSM poll doesn't make the election, a month before the election. Especially coming from a biased source like Newsweek. Even if all the polls come in this way, just work harder and pray harder. The President WILL win in the end.
This is self-fulfilling prophecy by the MSM. I suspect they would have published the same even if Bush had killed in the debate.
I'm not going to let this get me down, but I am frustrated with Bush/Rove. He should have spent that debate on the attack instead he played defense. If I was Bush every other word out of my mouth would have "flip-flopping, radical anti-war liberal from MA."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.