"I agree, and on state levels and local levels, party isn't completely an indicator. In Michigan, we would not have gotten CPLS passed without 1/3 to 1/4 of the dems backing it(Eileen DeHart and Chris Dingell most notably). 1/3 to 1/4 of the GOP opposed it, Joe Schwarz most actively. The problem is the dem leadership in the national level and their top funders."
My response: Nothing to argue with there. But there are folks at the lower levels in the Dem party who do not agree with the grabbers.
"I'm a Republican who has voted against anti-rights Republicans (one at a small level in the last election) in the past and would again. I also would not vote for Joe Schwarz whose running in the 7th district if I lived in that district."
My response: Good. The party labels usually don't mean much. Especially in the south. Lining up to drink the koolaid, regardless of who is dispensing it, is usually a dumb idea.
"Any anyone that votes to ban the .30-30, whether it be John Kerry or Lincoln Chafee doesn't deserve to be elected dogcatcher."
My response: dogcatchers get a bad rap. We shouldn't malign their otherwise good reputations by associating them with gun confiscators.
The party labels usually don't mean much
>>>
So then why did you choose one for your screen name, Democrat? (sniff-sniff)
So you're voting for the RAT on top of the ticket then?
(((crickets having crickets)))
Yeah, but he lives in Guam and has limited resources to do anything about it.
Sorry, but I give you a day or two here. You have too many of the DUisms going to give a good ride.
You are right though; a lot of Dims do believe in the RKBA. But they will cut off their nose to spite their face. As will you.