[1 spark]

World Net Daily ...and other media outlets ought to hire this guy to write a weekly column. Time to get the truth out.

[2banana]

"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves."
--Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965),_The Gathering Storm,_bk.I ch.19 p.348 (Houghton Mifflin, 1948)

[A Real Dan Fan... NOT]

In a way, I agree. They should NOT be called Islamic Terrorists. They should simply be called Muslims or Muslim Terrorists. That pretty much sums it up for me.

[GeekDejure]

The only way they can confront the threat of terrorism is to confront the ideology behind it and destroy the belief system that regards terror as a means of achieving God's pleasure. We can't praise a religion that prescribes terror and then expect its followers not to practice it. Islam must be abolished. The later we come to accept this fact, the more lives will be lost. ===========================================================

The most heinous and barbaric crime in this world would be to stop an individual from thinking freely. And when such a crime is "legalized" in the form of a "religion," one can easily imagine how disastrous it can be.

Islam is such a "religion" !!!

Islam imposes a threat to the whole world . . . which is far worse than deforestation, nuclear destruction or AIDS. It is an insidious, devilish disease creeping into the veins of the world. Every individual must realize the destructive and evil nature of this religion, for it eats away at the very foundation of humanity, which is:

an individual's ability to think individually and act accordingly !!!

.

[Eastbound]

"We're blaming that tiny, tiny minority of people who are using Islam as a weapon to get their own back against the West and to undermine all we're trying to do."

Tiny minority my tocus. Ninety-three percent of a recent Al Jazeera phone poll of ME Islamics could not find it in their hearts or in their religion to condemn the islamofascist terrorists for the kidnappings and beheadings, even while the ritual blood sacrifices were in progress. It appears Allah has acquired a taste for blood -- especially the blood of innocents.

[Blzbba]

"Islam is an avowed enemy of democracy of freedom of human rights of your constitution of our country and of you"


And apparently, Islam is an enemy of the comma.

[FreedomPoster]

Summary, and something that's been said around here for quite a while: the only good Muslim is a bad Muslim. As paradoxical as it sounds, it is nevertheless true.

[Fatalis]

We have either Muslims or non-Muslims. If one is a Muslim one believes in everything Muhammad said including Jihad. The “average Muslim” can’t denounce Jihad because that would be going against the teachings of Muhammad. Why are there no marches in Islamic countries denouncing terrorism? Muslims are after all very excitable people and all it takes to bring them out into the streets shouting hysterically at the “enemies of Islam” is a fatwa. The reason there are no such demonstrations and fatwas is because they would be un-Islamic. No Mullah could issue a decree that would go against the explicit teachings of the Qur’an.

This explanation goes along with what I have read and everything I've seen. Nothing else makes sense.

[DJ Taylor]

This is just another piece that states the problem but hesitates to state the obvious when recommending a solution. What he could have said is that there are almost 1.5 billion Muslims in this world, and if we are going to win this war and preserve our country, our freedom, and our way of life, we will probably have to kill at least half of them.

We are fighting for our survival, and if we are not prepared to do what is necessary to survive, then we will not survive, nor do we even deserve to survive. Darwinism may be politically incorrect, but if we follow the politically correct route in this war, it will only lead to our extinction.

[Amish with an attitude]

The name is not so much as important as the intent. We are witnessing a world wide attempt by muslims to expand their influence, not unlike their goal to push from Spain into Gaul (modern day France) circa 730. If not for the valiant effort of Charles Martel which succeeded in stopping them at Poitiers in 732, we all might be speaking arabic.

History repeats itself yet again, our hero's in uniform are to thank for our freedom.

[Travis McGee]

We're going to find out, sooner or later,

If Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater.

[Publius6961]

“It would also send a clear message” added Carey, “to the average Muslim that they were not being blamed for terrorist attacks.” "He wants religious justification for his evil deeds, and we shouldn't give it to him," Lord Carey said.

Bishops seem to be like politicians. They eventually convince themselves that we need them more than they need us.
What's up with this "lord" business for a bishop? Whatever happened to the "humility" thing?

And he is precisely 100% wrong. The muslim terrorist can succeed only because, even if they are not given explicit overt support by "ordinary" muslims, the are afforded a huge crowd in which to hide, and the majority remains silent. Until that changes, yes, I can definitely blame all of them. Moron bishop or no.