Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PeopleSoft fires CEO Craig Conway
Fort Worth[less] Startlegram ^ | 10/01/04 | Michae Liedtke

Posted on 10/01/2004 8:50:42 AM PDT by harpu

TOO FUNNY for words...Arrogance (+ Ignorance) rewarded!!

PLEASANTON, Calif. - In a surprise move, business software maker PeopleSoft Inc. fired CEO Craig Conway on Friday, divorcing itself from the feisty leader who engineered the company's dogged resistance to a $7.7 billion takeover bid by rival Oracle Corp.

PeopleSoft's board replaced Conway with its chairman and founder David Duffield, who also is the largest shareholder. The board appointed chief financial officer Kevin Parker and Phil Wilmington, the company's top sales executive, as co-presidents.

PeopleSoft's board dumped Conway in a meeting late Thursday night, Skip Battle, a company director, told analysts during a Friday conference call.

"Over time, the board has become increasingly concerned with Craig's leadership," Battle said. "There is no smoking gun. It was a matter of the board losing confidence in Craig and when that happens a decision has to be made."

PeopleSoft announced Conway's ouster along with a pleasant surprise - the Pleasanton-based company revealed that its sales of new software licenses for the just-completed third quarter exceeded $150 million, much higher than analysts anticipated.

The decision to dump Conway after such a strong quarter raised questions about whether the shakeup is designed to set the stage for a more friendly deal with Oracle.

Conway, hired five years ago to replace Duffield as CEO, has been staunchly fighting to keep PeopleSoft out of Oracle's clutches for nearly 16 months.

Almost as soon as the company launched its hostile takeover attempt, Conway dug in his heels, describing the bid as "atrociously bad behavior" while lambasting Oracle CEO Larry Ellison as a sociopath.

Conway formerly worked under Ellison at Oracle, a dynamic that spiced the soap opera that has riveted Silicon Valley.

But Battle insisted Conway's firing had nothing to do with PeopleSoft's attitude toward Redwood Shores-based Oracle's $21-per-share bid.

Investors, though, appear to believe PeopleSoft is more likely to be sold with Conway out of the way.

PeopleSoft's shares surged $1.64, more than 8 percent, during Friday's trading to $21.49 on the Nasdaq Stock Market, where Oracle's shares climbed 55 cents, nearly 5 percent, to $11.83.

Oracle's bid received a major boost three weeks ago when a federal judge rejected an attempt to block the proposed deal for competitive reasons. That decision prompted many shareholders to begin pressuring PeopleSoft to open talks with Oracle, but Conway reiterated the company's determination to remain independent during a customer conference last week.

With Conway gone and the company coming off a surprisingly strong quarter, "many shareholders seem to believe PeopleSoft's board will now have the leverage to get a higher price," said American Technology Research analyst Donovan Gow.

But Gow still suspects Duffield, who founded PeopleSoft in 1987, might have reservations about selling to Oracle, his company's fiercest foe.

"PeopleSoft is Dave Duffield's baby," Gow said. "He may be just as adamant as Conway" about fending off Oracle.

Duffield has been in semiretirement, living in the Lake Tahoe area, since turning over the reigns to Conway in 1999, but he told analysts he is ready to get back to work.

"I'm here for the long term," Duffield said. "I'm totally energized. I think it's going to be a very fun exercise and good for shareholders."

Oracle has indicated it will fire more than half of PeopleSoft's 11,500 employees if it buys the company.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: peoplesoft

1 posted on 10/01/2004 8:50:43 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpu

I don't know about all this, but one of the nicest "ding" letters I ever received was from PeopleSoft.


2 posted on 10/01/2004 8:54:39 AM PDT by martin_fierro (It was like that when I got here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
The name of this company always reminds me of "Up With People". I keep expecting to hear singing.




(Disclaimer: This comment is for external use only. Any attempt to use this comment for serious discussion may lead to abdominal cramping. Discontinue reading if a rash results..)
3 posted on 10/01/2004 8:55:32 AM PDT by Redcloak (Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
PeopleSoft announced Conway's ouster along with a pleasant surprise - the Pleasanton-based company revealed that its sales of new software licenses for the just-completed third quarter exceeded $150 million, much higher than analysts anticipated.

Wow. A guy helps the company beat Wall Street, fights off a hostile takeover that would have resulted in half the company's workforce being laid off, and gets canned for his trouble.

I guess it's true. No good deed goes unpunished.

4 posted on 10/01/2004 9:08:07 AM PDT by Prime Choice (It is dangerous to be right when wicked is called 'good.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
The board voted 5 to 0 to block the Oracle takeover. There must be something really big that we are not seeing here. You don't have 100% of the board, a winning quarter and get thrown out on your arse. software companies have many times booked revenue improperly. Not saying in any way that PeopleSoft has done that. Just does not seem right when a CEO is canned and all the numbers say that he should be getting a bonus instead.
5 posted on 10/01/2004 9:16:42 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

It's about the stockholders not the workers. Whatever is best for the shareholders is the right thing to do.


6 posted on 10/01/2004 9:43:53 AM PDT by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo

Can you spell Microsoft?


7 posted on 10/01/2004 9:51:26 AM PDT by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

I'll spell Oracle.


8 posted on 10/01/2004 9:52:10 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Don't tell my mother I work for CBS. She thinks I'm a towel boy at a bordello.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Wow. A guy helps the company beat Wall Street, fights off a hostile takeover that would have resulted in half the company's workforce being laid off, and gets canned for his trouble.

Last year in the same quarter, PSFT did $160.5 million in new licenses. For this quarter, analysts expected $140-$147 million (one analyst thought $95 million or so, he was just an idiot). So yes, PSFT is better than expected, but still lower than last year.

Of course, lots of ERP companies are having lower license sales. Look at Lawson in Minneapolis for instance. They're canning 6% of their workforce, or 100 people. (I wonder if Willie Green has already posted that).

9 posted on 10/01/2004 9:54:12 AM PDT by Koblenz (Not bad, not bad at all. -- Ronald Reagan, the Greatest President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

We are currently undergoing a conversion to People Soft where I work. The university has spent A LOT of money on this, everything from software, to licenses, to the People Soft techs. We were told about Oracle trying to buy them out a while back. They made it sound like Oracle might simply do away with People Soft if that happened.


10 posted on 10/01/2004 10:08:44 AM PDT by labowski ("The Dude Abideth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
It's about the stockholders not the workers. Whatever is best for the shareholders is the right thing to do.

"PeopleSoft announced Conway's ouster along with a pleasant surprise - the Pleasanton-based company revealed that its sales of new software licenses for the just-completed third quarter exceeded $150 million, much higher than analysts anticipated."

What do the stockholders want, to lose money? Some folks are just too smart by half.

11 posted on 10/01/2004 10:08:59 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax
"Can you spell Microsoft?" I don't think Bill and the boys would be interested in PeopleSoft. PeopleSoft's main focus is if remember correctly are IBM AS-400 users not PC based systems. The company which is was with prior to where I am now had PeopleSoft as their main competitor. It could be that he used to be with Oracle and Larry and him had a big falling out. Because of the court ruling the PeopleSoft board could have agreed to go along with the takeover instead of fighting it and this did not set well with him so they canned him.
12 posted on 10/01/2004 10:51:47 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo
"Can you spell Microsoft?" I don't think Bill and the boys would be interested in PeopleSoft. PeopleSoft's main focus is if remember correctly are IBM AS-400 users not PC based systems. The company which is was with prior to where I am now had PeopleSoft as their main competitor. It could be that he used to be with Oracle and Larry and him had a big falling out. Because of the court ruling the PeopleSoft board could have agreed to go along with the takeover instead of fighting it and this did not set well with him so they canned him.

Microsoft is having enough problems trying to make Great Plains and the Danish company they bought (Navision) work right. Of course, MSFT was supposedly talking to SAP. That would've kept the business culture professors at business schools buy for years. Talk about a clash of cultures. That'd make DaimlerChrysler look like a perfect cultural fit.

13 posted on 10/01/2004 11:36:38 AM PDT by Koblenz (Not bad, not bad at all. -- Ronald Reagan, the Greatest President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
For what it's worth (and not much I might add), I think that Microsoft is looking at their embedded market for longterm growth. It's getting more difficult by the day to compete with Linux as Steve Ballmer(sp) mentioned. Notice all of the movement that they have been making this year in the all inclusive home entertainment center that they are working on. This will allow them to control the whole thing. Firmware, software, hardware. Margins should be very good and hacking and knockoffs will be minor problem at best.
14 posted on 10/01/2004 12:34:43 PM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson