Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LEHRER STACKS DECK AGAINST BUSH -- Liberal Bias? Naaaaaaah!
ICONOCLAST ^

Posted on 10/01/2004 4:02:08 AM PDT by Apolitical

Presidential debate moderator Jim Lehrer showed once again Thursday night why top aides to President Clinton used to call him "our moderator" when presidential debate time rolled around in 1996......

(Excerpt) Read more at iconoclast.ca ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; deceit; firstdebate; lob; setup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Lehrer might as well come out of the closet and join John Kerry's campaign team. Talk about setting up the Dem candidate to hit a few out of the park.
1 posted on 10/01/2004 4:02:09 AM PDT by Apolitical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

Lehrer played softball for Kerry, true enough.


2 posted on 10/01/2004 4:08:50 AM PDT by T'wit (There is only one form of government -- too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
It didn't matter. Bush came across as more honest, truthful, and the Defender of America.
3 posted on 10/01/2004 4:09:51 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

But Kerry didn't hit anything out of the park.


4 posted on 10/01/2004 4:10:40 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

Agree. Turns out that our Prez isn't as dumb as the Libs like to characterize. W recognized the pitfalls (e.g., "Mr. President, was it worth the over 1,000 soldiers killed to liberate Iraq?"). Every life, even a Lib's, is precious.


5 posted on 10/01/2004 4:12:20 AM PDT by goarmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I don't think it matters either. Bush failed to rebut a few points but took no serious harm. Draw.


6 posted on 10/01/2004 4:14:02 AM PDT by T'wit (There is only one form of government -- too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

I thought he was going to trip on his wing tips running to Kerry on the stage so quickly.


7 posted on 10/01/2004 4:15:05 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Troll-Patrol! You've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

I like Mr. Bush and I will vote for him , but the fact is he sucked last night. He had several times when he could have nailed Kerry to the cross and he let him go, He paused too often and he took too long to answer what should have been easy home runs.

Kerry started off scared , his voice quaking , but as they went along his confidence built while the President lost his. The President kept trying to put across talking points instead of asnwering the questions in his own words., He kept pushing the Wrong war at the Wrong time talking point when once was one time too many. It was like he got stage fright.
I think George Bush's election is necessary for this country, but anyone placing their vote on the outcome of
this debate isnt going to place it for Bush. We have to be honest and say either the people who prepared him for this debate didnt do their job or Bush got stage fright, he damned sure didnt win last night.You could se his confidence slip away.


8 posted on 10/01/2004 4:19:34 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Not only did Kerry not hit any out of the park, it was plain for anyone to see that Lehrer was bias in his questions.


9 posted on 10/01/2004 4:19:36 AM PDT by stockpirate (Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical
No matter. The president is credible and Kerry is not. Kerry is not focused or credible. I don't know if Kerry is not focused because he is not credible or if he is not credible because he is not focused. Anyway, it ain't HIM!
10 posted on 10/01/2004 4:20:42 AM PDT by SMARTY ('Stay together, pay the soldiers, forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus, to his sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

 "Kerry's Iraq policy rests almost solely on the promise that he'll persuade Old Europe to pitch in and take some of the load off U.S. forces...."

Kerry saying that would've been just one more flip-flop given his complaint at the beginning that GW "outsourced" Bin Laden's capture to Afghans.

That was when I left the room because my democrat mother-in-law started cheering Kerry's 'zinger'.

11 posted on 10/01/2004 4:21:06 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical
I was a little disappointed, but I realize that in order to fully rebut some of Kerry's sh**, the Prez would have had to engage in personal attacks. He has yet to do it and I think it is the right track.

Besides, the Prez already has a mandate as far as the WOT goes and didn't have to score big during this debate. It is better to let the Kerry team get excited, then finish strong with the best performance at the final debate. I believe the Prez will do better at the Town Hall style meeting that comes next, then be loaded for bear at the final debate.

12 posted on 10/01/2004 4:23:35 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

Was I seeing things last night, or did Lehrer ONLY shake Kerry's hand at the end?


13 posted on 10/01/2004 4:25:26 AM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepubMommy
Was I seeing things last night, or did Lehrer ONLY shake Kerry's hand at the end?

I'm not sure if he did or didn't, but Lehrer did wink at Kerry as he shook his hand.

14 posted on 10/01/2004 4:28:57 AM PDT by itsinthebag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
[Bush] had several times when he could have nailed Kerry to the cross and he let him go,

Yes. And there were several times when Bush did nail Kerry to the cross (Global test?!?; can't form alliances while insulting our allies; " Help in on way" yet voted against funding).

Yet in your view he "sucked." Perhaps your expectations were too high. I dunno.

15 posted on 10/01/2004 4:32:00 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

I happen to believe that while Lehrer was impossibly slanted towards the left, he gave our President a chance to defend his presidency and he succeeded admirably.


16 posted on 10/01/2004 4:35:56 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsinthebag

The wink sez - THE FIX IS IN, YOU DID GREAT BY PREPARING WITH THE QUESTIONS I'D SENT YOU IN ADVANCE.


17 posted on 10/01/2004 4:39:55 AM PDT by prophetic (What do u call someone who flip-flops so much? A Politician? No, a HYPOCRITE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Apolitical

Yes, the wording was biased. We saw it and most of America saw it, but the fence sitters probably didn't. The debate (if that's what they want to call the q&a was) isn't for those already decided voters but for those who haven't a clue. For the clueless, one must pound home your points and show them definitively where you opponent is wrong. Bush failed to understand this point. He didn't have a grasp of the target audience. Could have cleaned Kerry's clock countless times but instead, let the lies lay.


18 posted on 10/01/2004 4:41:51 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

This reminded me a little of the Ali-Foreman prizefight. Kerry three a lot of punches, butr few landed. Bush threw few punches, but most of them landed. But yes, Bush seemed tired and Kerry got to let fly some unrebutted distortions.

The Tora Bora thing was tiresome. I doubt that Commander in Chief Kerry would have Al Queda shaking in their boots. Kerry's pals (France, Germany, the UN) share with the Muslim terrorists a hatred of Israel. Israel is the root issue of the war on terror, and I'm sad it did not get more discussion. I wish Bush would have said, "As we speak, Israel has just blown up the Iranian nuclear facilities."


19 posted on 10/01/2004 4:42:44 AM PDT by Puddleglum (If O'Neill worked for Nixon, who was Kerry working for? Ho Chi Min?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goarmy
Mr. President, was it worth the over 1,000 soldiers killed to liberate Iraq?

Any moderator who is even a little competent would be required to ask that question.

Any aspiring war leader should be required to hit it out of the park.

20 posted on 10/01/2004 4:43:39 AM PDT by Jim Noble (FR Iraq policy debate begins 11/3/04. Pass the word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson