Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoctorZIn

Iran leader reasserts arms views

Susan Chira NYT Friday, October 1, 2004

Iran's foreign minister has said that his country will never give up its right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful use, though he denied any intent to produce nuclear weapons.

.
The minister, Kamal Kharrazi, told journalists Wednesday that relations with the United States were at a low point, and charged that influential neoconservatives were urging the United States to attack Iran, seeking "regime change." But he said that Iran was ready to negotiate with European ministers to find a way to calm fears that it was developing nuclear weapons.
.
"Nobody has the right to deny Iran its right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes," he said. "We are ready to negotiate with them on any instrument or mechanism that would remove the concern of others."
.
Previous meetings with European ministers have ended with no resolution; Kharrazi said no new meetings had been scheduled.
.
Last week, Iran defied the International Atomic Energy Agency by saying it was resuming the process that enriches uranium, but it said it was to produce power, not bombs, as the United States has charged. The United States has been pushing to bring the matter before the UN Security Council.
.
Asked whether Iran had converted all the uranium it possessed, Kharrazi said, "I don't know, but the IAEA cameras are there."
.
During the Wednesday meeting with American journalists at the residence of the Iranian ambassador to the UN, Kharrazi also said that Iran was eager to see Iraq hold elections in January, even if not every city could participate - a position shared by Iraq's influential cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who has longstanding ties with Iran. He also said he was confident that the Iraqi elections, as well as elections scheduled Oct. 9 in Afghanistan, would be good for the entire region.
.
He said he was not worried that Iran's interests would be threatened by elections in the two nations, which border Iran. "Democracy does not necessarily bring pro-U.S. governments," he said.
.
Some Pentagon officials have charged that Iran is sending money and weapons into Iraq, both to bolster Shiite insurgents such as Moktada al-Sadr and to increase its influence over Shiite political parties to help sway the election.
.
"The Pentagon is quite wrong that Iran is doing this," Kharrazi said. Instead of backing al-Sadr, he said, Iran had in fact helped to moderate him.
.
The United States made a mistake in opposing al-Sadr, Kharrazi said, because it merely swelled his popularity. And he said Iran did not need to send money, since it already wields influence in Iraq.
.
He predicted that the insurgency would continue, swelled by resentment of ordinary Iraqis. "Iraqis who have been humiliated somehow by the United States - and their families have been killed or tortured - are very ready to kill Americans," he said.
.
He said the only solution would be a multinational force under the command of the United Nations, an idea the United States has opposed.
.
He cited recent opinion polls showing that even in nations whose governments have been friendly to the United States, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, the vast majority of people are hostile to the American government. Such hostility fuels extremism, he said.
.
Only if the United States changes policies that support Israel can it hope to win over ordinary people in the Middle East, he said.
7 posted on 09/30/2004 9:55:38 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoctorZIn

Iran reassures Russia on nukes

* Envoy says Tehran will work with UN to remove all concerns about its nukes

MOSCOW: Iran’s envoy to Russia assured Moscow on Thursday Tehran would work with the UN atomic agency to remove all concerns about its nuclear programme after Russia criticised Iran’s stance on the issue.

Russia’s criticism of nuclear partner Iran could lead to Moscow throwing its weight behind US efforts to take Iran to the UN Security Council for possible economic sanctions at a UN nuclear watchdog meeting in November, diplomats say.

In a note sent to Reuters after talks between Iranian Ambassador Gholamreza Shafei and Russia’s top nuclear official, Alexander Rumyantsev, Iran nevertheless stressed making nuclear fuel did not breach any UN nuclear rules.

“During the conversation Iran stressed that the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme is fully peaceful,” it said.

“While continuing to work with the IAEA and the global community to prove the Iranian nuclear programme is peaceful, Iran states that making nuclear fuel is within norms stipulated by the NPT (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty)...and no country can take away that right.”

Russia toughened its stance on Iran this month after Tehran threatened to defy a call by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for it to stop work on enriching uranium - a process that can be used to develop nuclear arms.

Formally, Russia - a permanent UN Security Council member with a veto right - opposes taking Iran to the Council.

Washington says Iran wants nuclear weapons and may use Russian atomic know-how to acquire them - a charge Iran and Moscow deny.

Russia has been building a nuclear power station near the Iranian city of Bushehr on and off for more than a decade. President Vladimir Putin has said Russia would ditch the $800 million project should Iran breach any IAEA requirements.

The Iranian embassy also said Rumyantsev would travel to Iran in late November to discuss nuclear ties. reuters

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_1-10-2004_pg4_12


8 posted on 09/30/2004 9:56:32 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn

Ahura Yazdi has cancelled his "liberation" trip to Iran after telling people for over 300 days that he will be going Iran. After taking 3 calls all the sudden the guy cancels his liberation trip.

He told the interviewer in Persian that he won't be attending now but will be attending sometime later. He said the Iranian government have worked it so that his plans will not work out.

He sounds like a total con dodging every single question and changing everything he's ever said during this interview. The interviewer slams him throughout with questions he answers and then quotes his previous statements for which he has no answer other then the Iranian government has plans.

http://www.radiofarda.com/iran_article/2004/9/8d99a998-73cc-4ae5-a0e2-f260ad4d19a3.html


11 posted on 09/30/2004 10:14:27 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn

He also said that the people of Iran will be free in spirit, but the interview questioned him on his previous statements on how he'd enter the country and there will be an immediate revolution, whereby he dodged the question and gave an off the wall answer about timing. The interviewer kept asking him so you won't return until the people themselves take out the regime and he kept saying it is the will of the people and said that it was the people who didn't want him to go.



12 posted on 09/30/2004 10:21:06 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk; McGavin999; SJackson; tet68; sionnsar; Stultis; river rat; risk; F14 Pilot; ...
From: Esther's Children: A Portrait of Iranian Jews.


Directors of Hebra. Hamadan, 1918. (Courtesy of Center for Iranian Jewish Oral History, CIJOH. From the collection of Faryar Nikbakht.)


Kohan’s Antiques and Persian Rug Store, and other Jewish-owned stores. Eslambol Street. Tehran, c. 1940. Nurollah Kohan with Pahlavi hat. (Courtesy of CIJOH. From the collection of Parvaneh Kohan Comrouz.)




Aqa-Jan Abrishami Synagogue, Iran’s most prominent congregation with Hakham Yedidia Shofet and Rav David Shofet as its rabbis. Tehran, c. 1980.


Cemetery. Lenjan, near Isfahan. 1993. (Courtesy CIJOH. Photograph by Annabelle Sreberny.)



View of Zir-e taq. The edge of the vaulted roof that covers the kucheh can be seen at the top of the photograph. Shiraz. At the time of Reza Shah a new street called Khiaban-e Now (New Street) was driven through Shiraz’s mahalleh, dividing the Jewish residential area into two separate sections. One continued to be called mahalleh, and the other was referred to as Zir-e taq (under the dom), so called because many of its alleys (kucheh), often no wider than a meter, were covered with a vaulted roof (see fig. 1462). In colloquial parlance, these narrow side streets were referred to as Ashti-konun (see fig. 1461)-- a term that vaguely translates into “forgive-and-forget”-- because the passage was so tight that if two estranged friends encountered each other in them they could not pass by each other without their bodies touching and would hence be “forced” to resolve the issue that stood between them. (Courtesy of CIJOH. Photograph by Prof. Laurence Loeb.)



Good book on history of Iranian Jews. Esther's Children: A Portrait of Iranian Jews by Houman Sarshar
14 posted on 09/30/2004 11:01:36 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson