Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee Shore

"no president would EVER use nukes except in retaliation for a nuclear attack on us or our closest allies. It just wouldn't be done"

In 2004, maybe not. In 2010 when Iran has twenty nukes and the Muslims have succeeded with a dirty bomb at the Superbowl, then it's a no brainer.


3,360 posted on 09/30/2004 9:55:11 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3324 | View Replies ]


To: FastCoyote

I just got home. Missed it all. Who won?


3,366 posted on 09/30/2004 9:57:19 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3360 | View Replies ]

To: FastCoyote

Not at all a no-brainer. The use of a nuclear weapon by terrorists leaves the problem of where to retaliate. Terrorists are not a country.


3,401 posted on 09/30/2004 10:05:48 PM PDT by Lee Shore (Oy, vay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson