I'll ask again. According to who? You?
Then yes, I agree that you think we presently have the most unconstitutional government in our history.
But, according to the United States Supreme Court, the de facto interpreter of the U.S. Constitution, your thinking is in error.
As I said before, your beef is with Congress, not the U.S. Constitution. Your problem is that very few people want what you want. So, to overcome that, your hope lies in twisting the U.S. Constitution and to use the courts to thwart the elected representatives in Congress and give you what you want.
Hey, it worked for the pro-abortion crowd, the atheists, the gays, the anti-gun groups, ... I'm sure you're encouraged by them.
As opposed to using Congress and the Courts to thwart the U.S. Constitution to give you what you want?
I'll ask again. According to who? You? Then yes, I agree that you think we presently have the most unconstitutional government in our history.
But, according to the United States Supreme Court, the de facto interpreter of the U.S. Constitution, your thinking is in error.
How weird pausen. Would you expect the Court to agree that our government is totally out of control with its unconstitutional socialistic programs?
As I said before, your beef is with Congress, not the U.S. Constitution.
Non sequitur. I have no beef with our Constitution.
Your problem is that very few people want what you want.
I want our government to stop ignoring our Constitution, paulsen. FR is dedicated to that same goal, as are millions of other Americans.
So, to overcome that, your hope lies in twisting the U.S. Constitution and to use the courts to thwart the elected representatives in Congress and give you what you want.
Babble on. I "twist" nothing.
Hey, it worked for the pro-abortion crowd, the atheists, the gays, the anti-gun groups, ... I'm sure you're encouraged by them.
Bizarro. Your desperation to make a point, any point, is driving you mad.