Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Been ticketed in the past year? You may owe more
AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF ^ | Thursday, September 30, 2004 | By Tony Plohetski

Posted on 09/30/2004 5:28:48 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952

DWI, lack of insurance among violations subject to new state fees, and DPS wants its money By Tony Plohetski

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Thursday, September 30, 2004

For Texans who have been ticketed for offenses such as driving without insurance and drunken driving in the past year, it's time to pay up.

More than a year after a law requiring drivers to pay additional fees for certain traffic violations took effect, state officials have begun sending letters to nearly 200,000 motorists notifying them that they should send money -- or have their driver's licenses revoked.

"It's imperative that people respond as soon as they get the letters," said Tom Vinger, spokesman for the Texas Department of Public Safety, which is administering the Driver Responsibility Program. "It's in their best interest to do that."

The new fees, which can be as high as $2,000 per year, are state fees added to the fine that local jurisdictions collect. They affect drivers who were found guilty or who pleaded no contest to drunken driving, driving without insurance or driving without a valid license since the law took effect Sept. 1, 2003.

DPS officials said the department didn't start collecting the money until now because it had to install a new computer system to handle the load.

The fees, which will be used to pay for programs for and improvements to Texas trauma centers and emergency medical services, were part of a plan that lawmakers approved in 2003 to combat traffic offenses and to offset the related costs.

Already, the state has collected $18 million from a separate $30 surcharge added to all moving violations, Gov. Rick Perry announced Wednesday.

Brackenridge Hospital, which received $483,349, is among several Austin hospitals to receive money.

"We are delighted," said Dr. Pat Crocker, the hospital's chief of emergency medicine. "We have lots of needs and projects we can wisely spend the money on."

In all, $67 million in fees is currently due to the state, and officials are mailing letters to drivers at a rate of 5,000 a day. DPS will keep 1 percent of the money to administer the program.

According to the DPS, most drivers owe money for not having insurance.

Under the law, the fine for that offense is $250 per year for three years. Drivers cited for driving without a license must pay $100 a year for three years.

The biggest fees will be paid by drunken drivers, who owe $1,000 per year for three years for their first offense, $1,500 for a second offense and $2,000 per year if their blood alcohol level was at least double the legal limit of .08.

Drivers must pay the fee within 30 days of the date on the letter from DPS or make arrangements to pay it, or their licenses will be revoked, which could lead to arrest and a Class B misdemeanor charge if they are later caught driving.

Drivers will not be exempt if DPS does not have their correct address; Vinger said some people may not know they owe money until they are being taken to jail.

"We don't want that to happen," Vinger said.

The law also allows authorities to assign drivers "points" for certain violations committed in Texas and other states.

Anyone who gets six points in any three-year period must pay $100. Since last September, 318 drivers have been assigned such points.

DPS will assign two points for a moving violation conviction in Texas or another state and three points for a moving violation that resulted in a crash.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: sep2003law; txdps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Texas DPS has finally gotten the software to enforce this year-old law. All I can say, it's about time.

Don't mess with Texas anymore.

1 posted on 09/30/2004 5:28:49 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Enforcement of the laws against uninsured driving might lead the way to enforcing immigration law. Illegals generally don't bother with insurance. They're used to breaking the law.


2 posted on 09/30/2004 5:31:18 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Pajamamama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
"The fees, which will be used to pay for programs for and improvements to Texas trauma centers and emergency medical services, were part of a plan that lawmakers approved in 2003 to combat traffic offenses and to offset the related costs."

This is dishonest on the part of the State of Texas. If your trauma center needs more $$, let the state legislature handle it.

Relying on fees from traffic violations incentivizes the police to issue many more tickets to maximize the cash flow.

Not a good idea at all.

3 posted on 09/30/2004 5:35:32 AM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Illegals generally don't bother with insurance. They're used to breaking the law.

No joke. We have so many illegals here that don't have insurance. Many of them also leave the scene of accidents, if their vehicle is not damage too bad. Some leave on foot if the vehicle is totally disabled.

4 posted on 09/30/2004 5:35:49 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (skerry's plan for oil independence - turn heinz tomatoes into oil????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
If your trauma center needs more $$, let the state legislature handle it.

The problem with this idea is, that costs taxpayers more $$s. I don't like paying more than I am already paying.

5 posted on 09/30/2004 5:38:00 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (skerry's plan for oil independence - turn heinz tomatoes into oil????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maeng; ValerieUSA; txflake; WinOne4TheGipper; DrewsDad; HiJinx; MeekOneGOP; Gracey; anymouse; ...

Texas law update ping.


6 posted on 09/30/2004 5:38:53 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (skerry's plan for oil independence - turn heinz tomatoes into oil????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

The other solution leads to fiduciary jackbootism.


7 posted on 09/30/2004 5:40:43 AM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
"for not having insurance.

Under the law, the fine for that offense is $250 per year for three years"

$750 in a three year time period is allot cheaper than my insurance was when we lived in Texas.
8 posted on 09/30/2004 5:41:13 AM PDT by lula (plsjr's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

This is criminal and someone should sue the state. It's nothing more than legalized theft.


9 posted on 09/30/2004 5:44:02 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Perry wants to lose.
I agree with him.


10 posted on 09/30/2004 5:51:52 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint

I hope the Democrats nominate a decent candidate.


11 posted on 09/30/2004 5:58:18 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
lack of insurance among violations subject to new state fees

Irrespective of who you pay, mandatory insurance requirements, are nothing more then a form of state imposed tax. They only serve to inflate the cost of insurance coverage by creating an imposed demand for insurance products, and by feeding the ever growing litigative machinery that enrishes ambulance chasers and overburdens our courts.

I am surprised that conservatives are so willing to fall for this racket. Think about it - it is basic economics 101 - your insurance would be cheaper if these laws were revoked.
12 posted on 09/30/2004 6:07:19 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
This is criminal and someone should sue the state. It's nothing more than legalized theft.

There is a similar law is in effect in several other states according to some local news sources.

13 posted on 09/30/2004 6:11:50 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (skerry's plan for oil independence - turn heinz tomatoes into oil????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
There is a similar law is in effect in several other states according to some local news sources.

The same insurance industry, and the same litigative interests, have pushed these laws through in most states. But, does that make it any less a legalized taking? Or, have we all been suckered by the same sales pitch?
14 posted on 09/30/2004 6:17:22 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
But, does that make it any less a legalized taking? Or, have we all been suckered by the same sales pitch?

Nothing to do with sales pitches. I think there are too many "silky pony" lawyers like john edwards who are ruining our country while lining their pockets with money from frivilous lawsuits.

15 posted on 09/30/2004 6:24:03 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (skerry's plan for oil independence - turn heinz tomatoes into oil????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Texas: all your cash are belong to us!

I really hope this results in more people fighting tickets issued by the tax collectors out there that drive around in DPS vehicles.

16 posted on 09/30/2004 7:27:30 AM PDT by zeugma (Face it folks, the Great Experiment is over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

I have no problem with it. If you drive without a license or DUI, you are fair game.


17 posted on 09/30/2004 7:41:58 AM PDT by arjay (If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arjay

I've been driving for quite some time without a DUI.


18 posted on 09/30/2004 7:45:16 AM PDT by babaloo999 (Liberals say they're "Progressive". So is cancer.-------------------they're, their, whatever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: babaloo999

Okay. I made a syntax error. Never let it be said that Freepers are not eagle eyed.

If a person drives without a license or if a person drives while intoxicated, then that person is fair game, IMHO.

There is no excuse for either circumstance and both endanger the public.


19 posted on 09/30/2004 7:49:44 AM PDT by arjay (If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: arjay

Agreed. I was just having a little fun.

I have no sympathy for the DUIs, of course. Driving without a license doesn't necessarily present a danger to the public.
As long as they're not driving drunk or are otherwise unfit to drive, they're not any worse than some who do(allegedly) have licenses.
I would rather they not drive, too, but it's going to happen.


20 posted on 09/30/2004 9:07:26 AM PDT by babaloo999 (Liberals say they're "Progressive". So is cancer.-------------------they're, their, whatever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson