Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mexico Supreme Court rules against requiring voter ID
Roswell Daily Record ^ | 9/29/04

Posted on 09/29/2004 5:43:05 PM PDT by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
New Mexico, Old Mexico - what's the diff?
1 posted on 09/29/2004 5:43:06 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

NM voter fraud ping.


2 posted on 09/29/2004 5:44:46 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Ok, you NewMexicans, get a constitutional amendment for your state together and make it a requirement to present and ID and proof of residence at voting time. If not able to do so, allow them to vote on a provisional ballot but keep the provisional ballot separate until the voter's eligibility can be validated.
3 posted on 09/29/2004 5:46:43 PM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I'm afraid we're going to see fraud not only in New Mexico, but all over the nation come Nov 4th. This country is headed down a slippery coast that will lead to anarchy.


4 posted on 09/29/2004 5:46:54 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Rats want to give away our birth right to one man one vote!

Bottom line........every voter must prove citizenship, residency and identity.

Nothing less can be tolerated!!

5 posted on 09/29/2004 5:48:25 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Anybody but Kerry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well, we lost that state.


6 posted on 09/29/2004 5:48:43 PM PDT by Gustafm1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If these people are so worried about the disenfranchisement of voters, than why are the working double time to keep Nadar off of all of the states ballots!


7 posted on 09/29/2004 5:49:21 PM PDT by lionstar (www.discussdrudge.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
it's a Federal Election there should be Federal Laws on voting not state!!!
8 posted on 09/29/2004 5:50:55 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Democrats said some new voters — disproportionately the poor, minorities and students — might have trouble meeting the ID requirement.

The ID requirement is to show a ‘‘current and valid’’ identification that has a name and address and could include a photo ID, utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or other government document.

Yep, they convinced me. The poor, minorities and students would never have any type of photo ID. They don't even pay for their utilities. Poor, minorities and students are all living on the streets and dumpster diving. And they certainly would never receive any type of paycheck.

9 posted on 09/29/2004 5:51:11 PM PDT by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

GREAT!! Now we're going to have Jaun Fu#*ing Baldes' voting with either a red coffee bean or a blue coffee bean. This has got to be the biggest piece of voter fraud crap in the history of the U.S.!!!!!


10 posted on 09/29/2004 5:51:32 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton

Requiring ID sucks... makes ballot box stuffing some much more difficult for those poor lil' Rats.


11 posted on 09/29/2004 5:52:08 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why do the people who have no problem with showing an ID when cashing a check at the liquor store get all upset at being asked for an ID at the voting booth?


12 posted on 09/29/2004 5:53:13 PM PDT by aomagrat (Where weapons are not allowed, it is best to carry weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Thanks for posting this Libloather. The amount of possible fraud that comes with this ruling is incalculable. But even if they had ruled that an ID was required, the widespread use of absentee ballots by these "new" voters will still allow even greater potential for lawbreaking by the Rats. Unlike those who come to the polls and who have to sign a sheet, vote, leave and then return again (and hope no one recognizes them), those filling out absentee ballots can fill out two, three, or more ballots, slightly change a signature, and mail them in. I'm sure there will be attempts to put a voter ID on the legislative agenda, but with Dims in control and Fat Bill wielding a veto pen, I see no hope in the near term.
13 posted on 09/29/2004 5:53:43 PM PDT by CedarDave (RE. Orangeman Kerry: What will his color be for tomorrow's debate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
New Mexico, Old Mexico - what's the diff?

Well, NM is part of the United States....and...I live here. LOL

14 posted on 09/29/2004 5:53:51 PM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pctech

"come Nov 4th"

Hey, that is suppose to be for that other site. : )


15 posted on 09/29/2004 5:54:25 PM PDT by Peace will be here soon (Congrats Port Adelaide Power ! 2004 AFL champs !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Outside of LA does any other state require an ID to vote? Picture?


16 posted on 09/29/2004 5:56:01 PM PDT by deport ("Because we believe in human dignity..." [President Bush at the UN])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Crooks. I hope none of these clowns ever get considered for a federal judgeship.


17 posted on 09/29/2004 5:57:03 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
NM voter fraud ping.

Thanks for the ping! I have a feeling that this is the reason why Senator Domenici was on Brit Hume's sprogram this afternoon. NM will have unbelievable voter fraud as a result of this ruling.

18 posted on 09/29/2004 5:57:16 PM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deport

I did, I vote in Fairfax, va,


19 posted on 09/29/2004 5:57:37 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"And Democratic Attorney General Patricia Madrid said it ‘‘should put an end to the Republican Party’s efforts to put obstacles in the way of first-time registrants’ right to vote.’’ I'm sorry but i'd like to give her a good swift kick right in the caboose!!!
20 posted on 09/29/2004 5:57:51 PM PDT by lionstar (www.discussdrudge.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson