To: sinkspur
Nope. Jumped on a thread, and saw that same ol' debunked manure that she cuts and pastes at every chance, and I called her on it.
Perhaps you are the one stalking - you have become a habitual first responder to anything I post to Peach. I find that odd, because my impression has been that you actually think about the positions you take rather than regurgitating what you are told.
64 posted on
09/29/2004 8:22:01 AM PDT by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: sinkspur
And the libs claim that President Bush is a moron?!
66 posted on
09/29/2004 8:22:54 AM PDT by
demnomo
(Bush is all hot in a flight suit. Kerry is all wet in a wet suit.)
To: lugsoul
I do think about my positions, but I'm not going to be cross-examined as if in a courtroom.
82 posted on
09/29/2004 8:30:22 AM PDT by
sinkspur
("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: lugsoul
Would you mind enlightening us on this?
I have not found credible evidence that there was a 9/11 connection (Iraq-Qaaeda).
I definitely think we confuse our case when we make unsustainable claims.
However, I am quite aware of the numerous connections (non 9/11 operation) between Iraq and al-Qaaeda that absolutely posed a "gathering threat". (I don't know if I'd go so far as John Edwards to call it an imminent threat)
Where is the valid claim that there was a 9/11 link? Where is it rebutted? Thanks!
To: lugsoul
Your debunking is false. There are repeated instances of Saddam's intelligence agents meeting with al Queda operatives and OBL himself in the Sudan and in Afganistan. These date back into the early 90s and are referenced in the 911 Commission Report.
It refers to multiple connections, meetings and agreements.
Anyone claiming there were no connections is a liar.
154 posted on
09/29/2004 9:39:27 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(My father is 10X the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson