[freestyle]

And let me add...

lugsoul, while perhaps a bit harsh (I admit that I do not know the history between you two), is completely right. When you make specific and provocative claims, they need to stand up to the scrutiny of your enemies' critical eyes, and not just your friends trusting gaze.

[Peach]

Let me get this right.

Every news report I saw said that Shakir was Fedayeen. Then, based on a link you provided (the first I've seen btw, as others have mentioned Shakir was not Fedayeen but didn't provide a link) I saw that the 9/11 COmmission believes he is not a Fedayeen.

Instead, he's just an Iraqi national. Jordanian intelligence believe Shakir is Iraqi intelligence.

And Shakir was involved with some of the 9/11 terrorists.

And you are talking to me about provocative claims standing up to scrutiny?

Do you really see that much difference in Shakir being Fedayeen vs. Iraqi national and quite probably Iraqi intelligence?