I am NOT claiming that the entirety of you cut-and-paste job is false. I have contested individual parts of it because I, unlike you, actually have some interest in the truth. In this instance, I contested one of your statements - which is false. The fact that I haven't contested other statements, or that others may be true, does not make this one any less false. And it doesn't make you any less mendacious because you have posted true statements along with your falsehoods.
Second, as we've discussed before - if you think his nationality is significant evidence that the Iraqi government was involved in 9-11 planning, perhaps you need to reconsider your attitude towards Saudi Arabia. And maybe Egypt, as well.
Third - No, I am not angry, but I will call a lie a lie, and a liar a liar. You have a complete lack of honesty t your primary tactic with me is to ascribe some statement to me that I did not make and then run around whooping like an idiot.
Fourth, your post begs the question - if you are up to your neck in your hundreds of links, why are you so compelled to continue making statements about those links that you KNOW have been discredited? What does that say about the quality of the rest of them?
I've watched you operate around here for a while.
You ask a question. It gets answered. THen you ask another question and pretend the first question never got answered.
It goes on and on and you never stop. You are like a little pit bull. Are you James Carville? He operates like this.
And yes, I do believe the fact that at least one Iraqi national was at a pre-planning meeting for 9/11 is significant. That you don't seem to think it is important speaks volumes.
And you have no idea about my attitude with regard to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Just as you have no idea about a lot of things. Now run along and post to someone else who cares. You continuous stalking from thread to thread is unattractive.