Posted on 09/29/2004 6:27:44 AM PDT by crushkerry
I can't trust The Sheep to make any decision without the help and prompting of their favorite Hollywood stars. I myself will never again vote Democrat. But The Sheep always will.
This will not be a GOP landslide. This will be Y2K Redux: not just on a single battleground state, but nationwide and on a new level of violence.
I fear, but I tend to agree with you. I know it's somewhat negative, but we have to be realistic. There is a lot of hate against Republicans and conservatives. It's concentratd - cities and suburbs - but it's here.
I'm sure that's how we'd like it to come out, and I hope you're right. But Kerry will be good in this format -- much better than he's been on the stump.
It worked for them in Spain. However, you're correct - Americans are not Spaniards.
Any chance you'll change it to "Orangecrushkerry?"
"Kerry is the Wrong canidate at the Wrong time."
And in the Wrong place. If he had run in France...
Down Scooby. Down boy.
Kill joy.
Now is the time to work harder and POUR IT ON!
We just might tip the scales in a few undecided Congressional or Senate races.
How about it Alaska? Colorado? Florida? S. Dakota?
That's excellent news, in more ways than one. Logic dicatates (somewhat) that the larger Bush's lead becomes, the longer his coattails become. I know that's not always the case, but it seems to apply here because the party in general and the downticket candidates in particular are so closely identified with and supportive of the president that good will for G Dub should "trickle down" somewhat.
What can their panicked Dem opponents do? Pull a Daschle and embrace the president? That's a sign of desperation and one not likely to convince many voters (i.e, why vote for a Dem who likes the president when it's expedient when you can vote for the Republican who supports him nearly always?)
A Bush ample victory (or, dare I say, even a landslide) will give George W. Bush the greatest mandate for governance for a GOP president since, what, the Civil War? Majorities will increase in both houses of Congress, and no longer will the Dems talk about "stolen" elections and a"mandate-less" presidency.
A clear Bush mandate places immense pressure on the Dems to be less confrontational in the 2005-2006 Congressional period else they face retribution at the polls in 2006.
Perhaps I'm being too optimistic, but any way you slice it a sizable Bush win should make his next four years easier, comparatively speaking, than his first four when it comes to getting things done.
BIG things.
You're off the ping list. But "you don't have to get snippy about it".
The time to breathe easily is AFTER the post election law suites! ; )
Right Raggy! Ri Ragree Rerry is Rone!!!!
Exactly... Given the dem talent for committing voter fraud, along with the MSM's willing participation in a coverup of said fraud, this election is nowhere near "in the bag" for President Bush.
I won't believe that we've actually won until the innauguration!
Mark
Agreed. Encouraging this sort of thinking is dangerous. Extremely dangerous.
Agreed. Encouraging this sort of thinking is dangerous. Extremely dangerous.
For the sake of all Vietnam vets, Kerry needs to be buried, and good!
Exactly! Along with all his minions!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.