Posted on 09/29/2004 5:28:16 AM PDT by closet freeper
27 posted on 09/29/2004 5:48:57 AM PDT by Lonely NY Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Did they test her lungs? Did they inspect her index and middle finger tips? If someone is smoking, that will be solid evidence. A blood test would prove there is significant nicotine in her system.
How do they know she didn't smoke before she arrived on campus. The school can't control behavior outside of school.
I went to high school about 35 miles west of the county in the article, in Douglas county.
This exact time of year, our shop teacher allowed us to bring our deer rifles in for a class cleaning, and I wore a 4" locking buck on my side all four years. I graduated in 1985.
Agreed. Going back to the basics, the reason you don't convict people with no proof, is that then if the administrator was angry with the girl or somebody else he/she could easily falsely claim "they smelled like smoke" and punish them.
You're right of course... ~unless~ either of her parents smoke inside their home and she comes to school smelling like stale smoke every day.
She isn't going to smell ~that~ much like smoke from being around someone else smoking outside. There is a smell to someone who has just ~had~ a cigarette that is much stronger than just being around it. It doesn't last that strong very long.
She smokes, she got busted, and her folks should be the one with an opinion about it not the school, but I am not buyin' the 'it was a friend' story any more than my parents believed that I was just holding matches and a pack of cigarettes for a friend. ;~D
Technically, you are still allowed your constitutional due process if this is a public school.
Baloney.
Smoking is not a crime.
If her friends were smoking and not doing so on campus its no ones business. Why should she change her friends merely because they smoke?
The fact that she got into trouble which you base your argument upon ignores that the reason she got into trouble is bogus!
It doesn't matter if she was smoking or not. She was not caught with the "paraphanalia" nor was she caught smoking. Her guilt was inferred and conferred by this idiot of a principle and it is indefensible.
I'll say. An opus over this?
A potential juror, no doubt.
The administrator there grabbed her shirt, smelled it, started smelling her hair and said, Youve been smoking,...
Hmmm, sounds like assault to me, sue 'em!
She smelled of smoke. She didn't have any cigarettes on her. She wasn't seen smoking. End of story.
If you have blood on your shirt we assume you may have killed someone.
Letting their idiocy run rampant.
And if the kid stokes the wood burner before school? That Definately will make you smell like smoke.
"The administrator there grabbed her shirt..."
Anyone grabs my daughter's shirt and they're gonna get their ass handed to them.
It is if it is being done by a minor and can be proven. In this case, it cannot be.
Not only do I believe this will happen in the near future, but I also believe it will be a FEDERAL crime. Just wait, the stupidity of the populace will allow it to happen.
The amazing thing to me is that this is national news.
I am glad this was not true when I grew up. The incident where we threw a bag of manure through the librarian's car windshield and were known locally as the Manure Mob would surely have been discussed nationally and probably harmed my psyche. (I felt bad enough the way it was. It wasn't suppose to go through the windshield, only remain on it.)
You are absolutely correct. These are belief systems and not founded in science. They are religions and should be treated as such.
But where will they get all that tax revenue after it's no longer legal to sell it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.