If he does that AND THEN investigates other leaks which may have compromised national security, I'm all for it.
If he doesn't, but INSTEAD, pursues leaks which threaten the news sources of the leading liberal media, then I will conclude that this is a partisan witch hunt of the worst sort...and that all the liberal complaints about the low nature of the Bush Administration are true.
In another, but related matter, I saw that Kerry explained that he first voted for the $87 billion for Iraq because it was to be partially paid for by a rollback of tax cuts for the rich and included biddable contracts...and then changed his vote because these provisions were deleted from the final bill. If this is true, I might actually vote against Bush. I hope this issue is discussed in the debate.
I can't remember a time when I felt so bad about a Presidential election, when I felt both candidates were so unequal to dealing with the problems facing our country. I will vote for one or another because I must but I wish that my conscience would allow me to skip the whole shoddy business.
"Fitzgerald was hired to find out who gave Plame's identity to Novak (and perhaps Pincus and others).
If he does that AND THEN investigates other leaks which may have compromised national security, I'm all for it.
If he doesn't, but INSTEAD, pursues leaks which threaten the news sources of the leading liberal media, then I will conclude that this is a partisan witch hunt of the worst sort...and that all the liberal complaints about the low nature of the Bush Administration are true."
Have you seen one word quoted or attributed to Fitzgerald or anyone involved doing the investigation? Thus far I have not, now those who are being investigated seem to be doing all the talking.
"In another, but related matter, I saw that Kerry explained that he first voted for the $87 billion for Iraq because it was to be partially paid for by a rollback of tax cuts for the rich and included biddable contracts...and then changed his vote because these provisions were deleted from the final bill. If this is true, I might actually vote against Bush. I hope this issue is discussed in the debate.
I can't remember a time when I felt so bad about a Presidential election, when I felt both candidates were so unequal to dealing with the problems facing our country. I will vote for one or another because I must but I wish that my conscience would allow me to skip the whole shoddy business."
Are you just now getting the explanation about JFKerry's vote? I watched as Howard Dean, was all the rage as the primary races were heating up, and he was "anti-war". JFKerry need to show he was just as "anti-war" as Howard Dean, therefore he voted against the $87 billion and then claimed the reason he did was because it was not "partially paid for by a rollback of tax cuts for the rich and included biddable contracts". In a JFKerry world anybody making above $50,000 is RICH!
JFKerry will take what ever side at any given moment for his own political gain and then has a billion excuses for why he did what he did.