She may be a witness, as in she may have information that aids the investigation (knowingly or UNknowingly) and may not be complicit in any wrongdoing.
I posited that was her role on yesterday's thread. I hope I'm right. I've always like Miller.
Miller has been subpoened to testify before the grand jury in the Wilson/Plame leak. I have been wondering what she had to do with that case. It seems to all boil down to a liberal cabal withine the CIA who is leaking information to the NYT. Read the article that I posted from the WSJ.
Wasn't Miller the one the Slimes hung out to dry a few months ago, claiming that her "pro war" stance had "slanted" her coverage in favor of the Bush Administration (try real hard not to gag on that eyeroller)?