Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP_1900AD

Parkfield averaged a mag 6.0 quake every 22 years on a very regular schedule for a VERY long period of time.

So the area was wired up with more seismic monitoring equipment than any other place on earth....and then they didn't get the 22 year quake :-)

Actually pretty cool (presuming this did very limited damage, which it likely did) that it finally happened, as with more monitoring there than anywhere else on the planet, we'll learn an awful lot scientifically from this quake.


140 posted on 09/28/2004 10:41:37 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

I guess everyone else in the office felt it. I was too busy concentrating on my work.

I'm up in San Mateo, about 20 miles south of San Fran, so quite a distance away.


154 posted on 09/28/2004 10:45:05 AM PDT by Betis70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist

You are correct. The "expected" earthquake was in 1988. But in that 22 year "cycle" there was one that was about 10 years "late." Some say that the Coalinga earthquake changed the stress field enough to delay the "expected" Parkfield earthquake (until today).


419 posted on 09/28/2004 12:37:23 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson