Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: radicalamericannationalist
Said Civil War did result from the multicultural differences represented by the multilingual problem.

The specific cultural difference in question was the question of slavery: said cultural difference was addressed on both sides by English speakers (most non-English-speaking folks didn't give a s**t about it until the draft board told 'em to get on the train).

352 posted on 09/28/2004 3:07:47 PM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
1. The post in which you replied to asked for the identity of a multilingual, multicultural nation. That America was multicultural at that point, which you seem to admit, negates your attempt to use America as an effective example.

2. The language differences were quite important as they tied into the cultural difference. The urban areas more likely to have non-English speakers were in industrialized regions in the North that had different cultural and economic interests than the agrarian South.

3. Again, this argument assumes you are correct that there were indeed "very large tracts of this country that didn't speak English until the advent of compulsory public education." What were these "vast areas" and what were their percentage of the population?
367 posted on 09/28/2004 3:13:33 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson