To: Havoc
What's hollow about any of my words? How in the heck do you think you could possibly "defang" me with the lame arguments I've heard on here?
Are you wanting me to come up with a detailed repudiation of a long-winded Lyndon LaRouche story? I've included a few links among my posts to points I've made. Come off it!
It seems obvious that you can't appropriately counter my arguments regardless of context. Go ahead and call my words "BS".
It seems you and the others have nothing of more substance to offer.
To: ScottM1968
Buggywhips are obsolete or darn close to it. I listed off the jobs you want to say are obsolete as an escuse for what you're saying and practicing. And you don't see that as problematic - of course nobody can counter your arguments. In your world words don't mean anything. They're just a means to an end. No wonder you guys are so rabid and nasty in many cases. You don't have a foot to stand on much less anything other than pretense.
60 posted on
09/27/2004 9:15:14 PM PDT by
Havoc
(Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade.)
To: ScottM1968; Havoc; Poohbah
Scott, we are STILL waiting for you to demonstrate that the quotations in the article are inaccurate or fabricated.
Source is irrelevant when dealing with facts, as you may recall from evidentiary principles 101.
139 posted on
09/28/2004 8:14:59 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson