[beezdotcom]

I'm guessing nobody read the LAST LINE OF THE ARTICLE. The one that tips you that the President being referred to in the article WAS CLINTON.

I weep for the future.

[Fatalis]

" I'm guessing nobody read the LAST LINE OF THE ARTICLE. The one that tips you that the President being referred to in the article WAS CLINTON.

I weep for the future. "

You should weep for the future of the writer because the question about whether Clinton lied definitely doesn't dominate this campaign or any other. Why should I read to the bottom of an article that starts out with nonsense?

[Fatalis]

I mean "the question about whether Clinton lied ABOUT IRAQ definitely doesn't dominate this campaign or any other."

Yikes!