To: Brilliant
Ask the reporters. They have no privilege. They were involved in a crime, even if they were not themselves committing it I don't see you demanding that Novak be held to this standard.
To: liberallarry
"I don't see you demanding that Novak be held to this standard."
Lots of us think Novak should be required to report his source. As far as we're concerned, reporters who divulge classified information, or any information protected by law such as grand jury testimony, are accessories to a crime. Quite simply, we do not trust the press not to fabricate stories based on made-up or dubious sources.
To: liberallarry
How do you know Novak hasn't testified to the grand jury?
What lie has he disseminated regarding this matter? None! He did not push the Wilsonian spin/lie so he did not participate in the crime. He revealed an aspect of it.
40 posted on
09/27/2004 7:37:12 AM PDT by
cyncooper
(Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
To: liberallarry
Absolutely. Novak should have to tell what he knows.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson